Laws Lawyers Find Laws Legal Forms State Laws Bills
Home » Find Laws » Laws » Baker v. Carr

Baker v. Carr

Listen
The Background of Baker v. Carr (1961)Within the legislation expressed in the Tennessee State Constitution –enacted in 1901 - required that the districts of Tennessee be reformulated every 10 years in order to accommodate an accurate portrayal of the population with regard to each respective jurisdiction. Charles Baker explained that the State had refused to remap the districts in accordance to the precepts set forth within the applicable legislature. Although the State of Tennessee maintained that the adherence to the measures of districts was political in nature, Baker contended that the establishment of districts was a legislative matter:The nature of legal issues rooted in politics in contrast with those rooted in legislature were called into question with regard to the analysis of Baker’s complaint; Baker brought forth the Supremacy Clause within the Constitution, which mandated the Federal government’s eligibility to maintain jurisdiction over State legislationThe Case Profile of Baker v. CarrThe following is a case profile of the legal trial eponymously titled ‘Baker v. Carr’:Date of the Trial: October 9th, 1961Legal Classification: Administrative Law; this legal field associated with events and circumstances in which the Federal Government of the United States engages its citizens, including the administration of government programs, the creation of agencies, and the establishment of a legal, regulatory federal standardThe Nature of the Appeal: The following criminal activity and charges were cited by Charles W. Baker against Joe C. Carr – the appointed representative of the State of Tennessee - within the appeal brought forth subsequent to the initial ruling:Baker maintained that the legislation expressed in the State of Tennessee’s Constitution in 1901 with regard to the establishment of districts was in direct violation of 14th Amendment Rights entitled to citizens of the United StatesUnited States Reports Case Number: 369 U.S. 186Date of the Delivery of the Verdict: March 26th, 1962Legal Venue of Baker v. Carr: The Supreme Court of the United StatesJudicial Officer Responsible for Ruling: Chief Justice Earl WarrenInvolved Parties: The following are the parties named with regard to their involvement in the Baker v. Carr case:Charles W. Baker; Plaintiff – Baker v. CarrJoe C. Carr; Defendant - Baker v. CarrVerdict Delivered: The Supreme Court claimed that the State of Tennessee’s refusal to adhere to the expressed legislation of remapping districts was in direct violation of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause, which requires that every individual citizen of the United States be entitled to equal, uniform, and unbiased protection and preservation with regard to the pursuit of happiness.Associated Legislation with regard to Baker v. Carr: The following statutory regulations were employed with regard to the Baker v. Carr trial:The 14th Amendment illustrates legislation that disallows the government from infringing on the right(s) to pursue ‘Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness’ with regard to any and all citizens of the United States of America – this statute is applicable to all measures of gender, race, religion, and ageArticle III of the Constitution of the United States – within Section 2 – illustrates a legislative clause untitled the Supremacy Clause, which allows the Federal Government to maintain authority over all legislation in the event that contrast and unfair advantage exists; this clause was imposed in order to ensure a uniform and equal legal process within the entirety of the United States
Font Size: AAA
Loading...
  • Play
  • Pause
  • Volume:
  • Mute
  • Half
  • Max
  • Baker V Carr

    The Background of Baker v. Carr (1961)

    Within the legislation expressed in the Tennessee State Constitution –enacted in 1901 - required that the districts of Tennessee be reformulated every 10 years in order to accommodate an accurate portrayal of the population with regard to each respective jurisdiction. Charles Baker explained that the State had refused to remap the districts in accordance to the precepts set forth within the applicable legislature. Although the State of Tennessee maintained that the adherence to the measures of districts was political in nature, Baker contended that the establishment of districts was a legislative matter:

    The nature of legal issues rooted in politics in contrast with those rooted in legislature were called into question with regard to the analysis of Baker’s complaint; Baker brought forth the Supremacy Clause within the Constitution, which mandated the Federal government’s eligibility to maintain jurisdiction over State legislation

    The Case Profile of Baker v. Carr

    The following is a case profile of the legal trial eponymously titled ‘Baker v. Carr’:

    Date of the Trial: October 9th, 1961

    Legal Classification: Administrative Law; this legal field associated with events and circumstances in which the Federal Government of the United States engages its citizens, including the administration of government programs, the creation of agencies, and the establishment of a legal, regulatory federal standard

    The Nature of the Appeal: The following criminal activity and charges were cited by Charles W. Baker against Joe C. Carr – the appointed representative of the State of Tennessee - within the appeal brought forth subsequent to the initial ruling:

    Baker maintained that the legislation expressed in the State of Tennessee’s Constitution in 1901 with regard to the establishment of districts was in direct violation of 14th Amendment Rights entitled to citizens of the United States

    United States Reports Case Number: 369 U.S. 186

    Date of the Delivery of the Verdict: March 26th, 1962

    Legal Venue of Baker v. Carr: The Supreme Court of the United States

    Judicial Officer Responsible for Ruling: Chief Justice Earl Warren

    Involved Parties: The following are the parties named with regard to their involvement in the Baker v. Carr case:

    Charles W. Baker; Plaintiff – Baker v. Carr

    Joe C. Carr; Defendant - Baker v. Carr

    Verdict Delivered: The Supreme Court claimed that the State of Tennessee’s refusal to adhere to the expressed legislation of remapping districts was in direct violation of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause, which requires that every individual citizen of the United States be entitled to equal, uniform, and unbiased protection and preservation with regard to the pursuit of happiness.

    Associated Legislation with regard to Baker v. Carr: The following statutory regulations were employed with regard to the Baker v. Carr trial:

    The 14th Amendment illustrates legislation that disallows the government from infringing on the right(s) to pursue ‘Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness’ with regard to any and all citizens of the United States of America – this statute is applicable to all measures of gender, race, religion, and age

    Article III of the Constitution of the United States – within Section 2 – illustrates a legislative clause untitled the Supremacy Clause, which allows the Federal Government to maintain authority over all legislation in the event that contrast and unfair advantage exists; this clause was imposed in order to ensure a uniform and equal legal process within the entirety of the United States

    Related Articles

    Link To This Page

    Comments

    Guide to Finding a Lawyer
    Tips