Miller v. California

Miller v. California

Share
Miller v. CaliforniaThe Background of Miller v. California (1973)
Miller v. California was a Supreme Court case involving an individual named Marvin Miller, who was in ownership of a commercial operation that undertook the provision of items considered to be ‘sexually explicit’ in nature. In 1972, Miller undertook an advertising campaign in which he disseminated a mass amount of letters to individuals who did not request such information; a mother and her child received one of Miller’s advertisements and were offended by the nature of the publications – shortly afterwards, they complained to California law enforcement:
Miller was found guilty of disseminating material considered to be unsuitable and objectionable with regard to the public sector; however, Miller appealed the verdict with regard to the determination of ‘obscene’ – he claimed that the ruling was a violation of his 1st Amendment Rights, which awarded him the freedom of speech and expression
The Case Profile of Miller v. California
The following is a case profile of the legal trial eponymously titled ‘Miller v. California’:
Date of the Trial: January 19th, 1972
Legal Classification: Administrative Law; this legal field associated with events and circumstances in which the Federal Government of the United States engages its citizens, including the administration of government programs, the creation of agencies, and the establishment of a legal, regulatory federal standard
Accused Criminal Activity: The following criminal activity and charges were cited by Miller against the State of California
Marvin Miller claimed that he was being unlawfully censored due to the fact that both the concept and notion of material deemed to be ‘obscene’ was determined on a subjective basis
United States Reports Case Number: 413 U.S. 15
Date of the Delivery of the Verdict: June 21st, 1973
Legal Venue: The Supreme Court of the United States
Judicial Officer Responsible for Ruling: Chief Justice Warren E. Burger
Involved Parties: The following are the parties named with regard to their involvement in the Miller v. California case:
Marvin Miller, in the midst of Miller v. California, was the plaintiff of the case; this case took place in an appellate forum following the prior guilty verdict issued to him
The State of California was the defendant within Miller v. California
Verdict Delivered: Marvin Miller was found guilty of the misdemeanor of distributing material that could be considered to be objectionable in nature
Associated Legislation with regard to Miller v. California: The following statutory regulations were employed with regard to the Miller v. California trial:
The 1st Amendment affords citizens of the United States with the freedom of religion, the freedom of press, the freedom of speech, and the right of assembly
The development of the ’Miller Test’, which is defined as methodology of the classification of whether or not material is to be deemed as obscene; this includes the application of community standards and the preservation of wellbeing within the public sector, the degree of offensiveness latent within the expression in question, and an analysis of the expressed intent of the creator

Comments

comments

Share

Related Articles


Read previous post:
The Case Profile of John Dillinger

Close