Famous Trials

Black Dahlia Murder In Depth

Black Dahlia Murder In DepthWhat is the Black Dahlia Murder?

The Black Dahlia Murder was an informal classification given to a murder that too place in Los Angeles, California on January 15th, 1947; the term ‘Black Dahlia Murder’ was given to this particular murder due to the fact that the victim of the murder – 22 year old Elizabeth Short – was nicknamed the ‘Black Dahlia’. Many historians maintain that the nature of this nickname was derived from the fact that Short was oftentimes seen donning black clothing, which accompanied her black hair. Although upwards of 60 suspects were called into question, the true murderer of Elizabeth Short has never been determined, making the Black Dahlia Murder one of the most prolific and noteworthy unsolved murder cases in the history of the United States.

Details of the Black Dahlia Murder



Elizabeth Short’s body was discovered on January 15th, 1947 in a deserted patch of land in Leimert Park – an area of suburban Los Angeles. Despite the finding of Short’s corpse, forensic technology had prevented law enforcement agents from determining the precise time of her murder:

Elizabeth Short was found to be drained of most of her blood; not only had her torso been traumatically severed, but she had suffered abrasions to her face – the area at which her cheeks met the sides of her mouth were severed

Her body was assumed to have been washed and treated for the removal of evidence; in addition, she was found to be seemingly positioned with her hands behind her head

Perhaps amongst the most gruesome details of the Black Dahlia Murder was the notice that not only had Elizabeth Short assumed to have been forced to consume fecal matter, but she had been the victim of sexual assault posthumously

Profile of the Black Dahlia Murder



The following outlines the crimes involving the Black Dahlia Murder

Suspect of the Black Dahlia Murder: Although there have been upwards of 60 suspects – ranging in notoriety – the murderer of Elizabeth Short has never been determined

Date of Birth of the Victim: Elizabeth Short was born on July 29th, 1924 in Hyde Park, Massachusetts; she is assumed to have died on the day of the discovery of the Black Dahlia Murder – January 15th, 1947

Residence of the Victim: Los Angeles, California

Notable Details and Personal Information: The following personal details have been considered to be contributory to the behavior and criminal actions undertaken in conjunction with regard to the Black Dahlia Murder; in addition, these case details were made mention within the criminal investigation of the Black Dahlia Murder:

Subsequent to the discovery of the Black Dahlia Murder, Elizabeth Short’s life was subject to a thorough investigation; both her past – as well as her undertakings prior to her murder – were examined

Celebrities including musician Woody Guthrie and actor Orson Welles were both considered to be suspects – albeit for a brief period of time

Many individuals placed the blame of the failed investigation with regard to the Black Dahlia Murder on the rampant and frenzied media coverage

The Supreme Court Cases List

The Supreme Court Cases ListWhat is the Supreme Court?

The Supreme Court of the United States of America is the highest court system in the nation. The Supreme Court, as a result of this classification and function, possesses ultimate; however largely discretionary, appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal court systems, as well as original jurisdictions or local courts, in the United States.

The Supreme Court of the United States meets in Washington, D.C. in the United States Supreme Court Building. The Supreme Court consists of a chief justice and eight acting associate justices who are nominated by the President of the United States of America and subsequently confirmed by the U.S. Senate. When a chief justice is appointed, he or she maintains life tenure unless they are removed after impeachment.

What is the Supreme Court Cases List?

The Supreme Court Cases list refers to the tangible archives, which store and house all decisions rendered within the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court cases list is therefore the tangible archives that hold all the decisions rendered by the Supreme Court. In addition to the verdicts or precedents established, the Supreme Court Cases list will outline the main points of the case as well as the intricacies aligned with the case. The Supreme Court Cases list will also include all testimonials, significant entries of evidence, as well as crucial dialogue that was latent in the particular case.

Any individual or legal professional can evaluate these documents to analyze the intricacies surrounding any Supreme Court Case. The ability to evaluate the Supreme Court Cases List will offer a description and ideological approach in regards to how laws are viewed and subsequently upheld in the United States. Additionally, by viewing a Supreme Court Cases list an individual can better understand the United States Constitution and the United States’ Federal government’s interpretation of particular laws or sociological issues.

The majority of cases heard in the Supreme Court carry an unwavering significance in regards to sociological precedence and importance. The cases heard in the Supreme Court essentially traversed through the lower court systems who viewed the particular subject matter as hazy or ambiguous. As a result of the pending nature, the case and the attached subject matter is sent to the Supreme Court where the highest and most prominent judicial officials will review the subject matter latent in the particular case. As stated before, engaging and evaluating a Supreme Court Cases list will enable an individual or legal professional to evaluate precedents and the tangible decision making process latent in groundbreaking legislature or rulings. These particular cases essentially laid the groundwork for fundamental sociological behavior and formalities that are still present in the United States to this day.

How to observe the Supreme Court Cases List:

A Supreme Court cases list can be obtained and subsequently reviewed on numerous websites, including the United States’ Supreme Court website, located at www.supremecourt.gov. Additionally, the tangible version of the United States Supreme Court list can be observed at the national archives in Washington, D.C.

Ted Kaczinski: the Unabomber

Ted Kaczinski: the UnabomberWhat is a Terrorist?

The act of terrorism refers to the systematic and diabolical use of terror as a means of coercion. Although there is no universally criminal law definition of terrorism, common characteristics of the act refer to the delivery of violent acts which are intended to precipitate fear on a given society. Acts of terror are typically perpetrated for a political, ideological or religious goal; terrorists deliberately target and subsequently disregard the safety of civilians. All terrorists and their underlying terrorist organizations will not align themselves with government organizations or formal government bodies.

Definitions of terrorism will always include acts of unlawful violence and war. That being said, any action that precipitates violence on a society and disrupts the harmony and general function of a particular community or sociological setting will be considered an act of terrorism.

Who is the Unabomber?

Ted Kaczinski, infamously known as the Unabomber, was an American mathematician, anarchist and drastic social critic who engaged in several acts of mail bombing.  The Unabomber inflicted carnage through mail bombs for nearly 20 years; the Unabomber’s terrorist activities took the lives of three people and injured 23 others.

Ted Kaczinski (also known as the Unabomber) was born in Chicago, Illinois where he was immediately viewed as a child prodigy due to his ability to excel academically at a young age. At the age of 16, the Unabomber was accepted into Harvard University where he eventually earned a Bachelor’s degree. The Unabomber continued his education at the University of Michigan, where Kaczinski earned a PhD in mathematics. The Unabomber, at age 25, became an assistant professor at the University of California, Berkeley, but resigned just two years later.

The Unabomber begins his reign of Terror:

After resigning from his post at Berkeley, the Unabomber moved to a remote cabin in Montana, which lacked running water and electricity. While removed from society, Kaczinski started a bombing campaign after watching the land and wilderness being destroyed by development companies. From 1978 to 1995, the Unabomber sent 16 bombs to various targets, including airline companies and Universities.

The Unabomber’s efforts, which killed three people and injured 23 others, prompted Kaczinski to send a letter to the New York Times on April 24, 1995. The letter was in a sense a negotiation, for the Unabomber promised to “desist from terrorism” if the Times or the Washington Post published his anti-government manifesto. In this manifesto, the Unabomber claimed that his killings and bombings were extreme but essential to attach attention to the destruction of human freedom that is widely precipitated by the modernization of technology.

FBI Investigation and capture:

The Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted a costly investigation and labeled Kaczinski (before his identity was known) as the “UNABOM” (University and Airline Bomber). Despite the FBI’s widespread investigation efforts, the Unabomber was not initially located. The Unabomber; however, was eventually found when Kaczynski’s brother and his brother’s wife recognized Kaczynski’s writing style and beliefs latent in the manifesto. Through this observance, the Unabomber’s family members tipped off the FBI.

The Unabomber’s Trial and Sentence:

Once located and subsequently caught, the Unabomber’s lawyers, who were court appointed, were eventually dismissed when Kaczynski opted to defend himself. The court eventually entered a plea, where the Unabomber was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The Unabomber was officially designated a “domestic terrorist” by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Patricia Krenwinkel: A Murderer

Patricia Krenwinkel: A MurdererWho is Patricia Krenwinkel?

Patricia Krenwinkel is an American criminal and former member of Charles Manson’s murderous cult, known as the “Family.” Patricia Krenwinkel who was convicted of murder in the first degree for her involvement in the Tate and LaBianca murders.

Patricia Krenwinkel was born in Los Angeles, California to a middle-class family. She attended High School in the Los Angeles area where she was routinely bullied and teased for being overweight and for an excessive growth of body hair precipitated by an endocrine condition. When her parents divorced she strongly considered becoming a nun and even enrolled at a Jesuit College in Mobile, Alabama. Within one semester; however, Patricia Krenwinkel dropped out and moved back to California where she lived in her step-sister’s apartment.

Patricia Krenwinkel involvement with Charles Manson

Patricia Krenwinkel first met Charles Manson in Manhattan Beach, California in 1967. Mesmerized by Manson’s charisma and charmed by his complements, Patricia Krenwinkel decided to move to San Francisco with Manson and two other girls, known as “Charlie’s Girls”.

As the Manson family grew, Patricia Krenwinkel and the other members went on a drug and sex-filled tour of the American west in an old school bus. When the hippie movement dissipated in 1969, Patricia Krenwinkel and the rest of the Family members opted to live in isolation from the rest of society. The eventually convinced a blind and elderly man, George Spahn, to allow them to love on his property. While the family converged and lived on Spahn’s ranch, Patricia Krenwinkel acted as a mother figure to the Family’s several illegitimate children.

Patricia Krenwinkel’s participation in the Family’s Murders:

Patricia Krenwinkel was a fundamental participant in the infamous murders that took place on August 9, 1969 at the home of actress Sharon Tate and director Roman Polanski. The murders began when a fellow Family member murdered teenager Steven Parent who was parked in a car in the estate’s driveway. After the murder, Patricia Krenwinkel and two other family members entered the house where mayhem ensued.

After entering, Patricia Krenwinkel dragged coffee heiress Abigail Folger from her bedroom to the living room, where she violently stabbed her. Folger escaped outside following the first bout of stabbing, only to be caught by Patricia Krenwinkel. When caught, Folger was brutally murdered by Patricia Krenwinkel on the front lawn of the estate.

After the Tate murder took place, Patricia Krenwinkel was a willing participant in the murders that occurred the following night. Along with Manson and a number of Family members, Patricia Krenwinkel went to the home of Southern California grocer Leno LaBianca and his wife, Rosemary. Manson tied the couple up and left the brutal slayings to Patricia Krenwinkel and two other members of the Family. After killing the couple, the killers stayed in the LaBianca’s home for a few hours where they ate and played with the deceased couple’s dogs, while Manson and the other Family members drove around Los Angeles looking for their next victim.

Patricia Krenwinkel’s Arrest and Trial:

After dodging numerous attempts by police to investigate the ranch (law enforcement officers initially brought the Family up on charges of auto theft) former Family member, Susan Atkins, who was in police custody, told her cellmate gruesome details revolving around the Tate and LaBianca murders. As a result of Atkins’ confessions, Patricia Krenwinkel was arrested near her aunt’s home in Mobile, Alabama on December 1, 1969. The following day, Patricia Krenwinkel was indicted for seven counts of first-degree murder and one count conspiracy to commit murder.

Following a nine month trial, Patricia Krenwinkel was convicted of all counts and sentenced to death on March 29, 1971. The death sentence imposed on Patricia Krenwinkel; however, was commuted to life in prison following the California Supreme Court’s decision which invalidated all death sentences imposed in California prior to 1972.

While in prison, Patricia Krenwinkel distanced herself from Manson and the family; she earned a Bachelor’s degree in Human Sciences and remains an active participant in the prison’s rehabilitative programs. Patricia Krenwinkel has been imprisoned longer than any woman in the history of California’s prison system.

Richard Ramirez: The Night Stalker

Richard Ramirez: The Night StalkerWho is Richard Ramirez?

Also known as the ‘Night Stalker’, Richard Ramirez is an American serial Killer who is currently awaiting execution on California’s death row at San Quentin State Prison.

Richard Ramirez, during his youth, was a satanic worshipper and a habitual drug user. When Ramirez turned 12 he became infatuated with his cousin, Mike, who was a Vietnam veteran and ex-Green Beret. While home deployment, Mike commonly shared gruesome war pictures with Ramirez that portrayed savage images of human torture, rape and murder. Overtime, Richard Ramirez became fascinated with this pictorial brutality.

Richard Ramirez’s influences:

Richard Ramirez, during this time, would often smoke marijuana with his cousin while talking about the war and the savageness that took place in Vietnam. One day, in retaliation to complaints made by his wife that he was lazy, Mike (Richard Ramirez’s) cousin shot his wife in the face with Richard Ramirez standing just a few feet away. As a result of his veteran status, Mike was sentenced to only seven years in prison for the savage killing.

By the time Richard Ramirez reached 18, he was a habitual drug user and Satan worshipper. While addicted to drugs, Richard Ramirez toiled in petty crimes that eventually grew more severe in nature; in the beginning of his menacing run, Richard Ramirez was arrested on numerous drug and theft charges.

Richard Ramirez’s turn to Pure Evil:

After being arrested for the aforementioned crimes, Richard Ramirez upon being released, eventually moved to Southern California, where he advanced to armed robbery and breaking into homes. When Richard Ramirez became a proficient criminal, he began to linger in the homes of his victims.

On June 28, 1984, Richard Ramirez entered through an opened window of Jennie Vincow (aged 79). After finding nothing of value to steal, Richard Ramirez grew incredibly angry and decided to murder Vincow while she was sleeping. This heinous act aroused Richard Ramirez to the point where Ramirez would begin partaking in sexual activities with his victim’s corpses.

After remaining quiet for eight months, Richard Ramirez assaulted 22-year-old Angela Barrio outside of her condo; after injuring barrio, he entered the girl’s condo where he killed Dayle Okazaki (Barrio’s roommate). Within an hour of the murder, Ramirez murdered Tsai-Lian Yu in Monterey Park, by dragging the women out of her car and shooting her; three days later Richard Ramirezz murdered an eight-year-old girl and numerous throughout the mid-1980s. 

The savageness intensified with each victim as Richard Ramirez began partaking in post-mortem mutilations. Richard Ramirez grew a disgusting satisfaction for his crimes and eventually started leaving pentagrams alongside his victim’s bodies. 

The end of Richard Ramirez’s Deadly Reign:

On August 24, 1985 Richard Ramirez travelled south of Los Angeles, where he broke into the home of Bill Cards and fiancée, Inez Erickson. Ramirez shot Carns in the head and raped Erickson. Ramirez then tied up Erickson and left the apartment. While struggling, Erickson gained enough strength to peek out her window where she saw Ramirez leaving. Upon driving away, an observant teenager wrote down the license plate number of Ramirez’s car after noticing it cruising suspiciously throughout the neighborhood. The information was sent to the Police who later located the abandoned car and collected fingerprints from inside. A computer match was then made of the prints and the identification of Richard Ramirez, the night stalker, became known.

Unaware that his picture was made public, Ramirez was positively identified after entering a Los Angeles liquor store. When word spread the Ramirez was nearby, a mob formed and began chasing Ramirez with steel pipes and rods. When the mob caught up with Ramirez, they subdued him until police arrived.

Richard Ramirez Trial:

Due to countless appeals on the part of Ramirez’s defense, the trial lasted an exhausting four years. On September 20, 1989, Richard Ramirez was found guilty of 43 counts, including 13 murders and charges revolving around sodomy, burglary and rape. Currently, as stated before, Richard Ramirez waits on the death row, until he runs out of appeals.

An Al Capone Biography

An Al Capone BiographyAl Capone Biography: Background on Al Capone

Al Capone is viewed as one of the most notorious and recognizable criminals in the history of the United States; many historians and law enforcement agents maintain that the name ‘Al Capone’ is oftentimes synonymous with the modern institution of organized crime. Throughout his criminal history, Al Capone is considered to have evaded a bulk of criminal charges and convictions; upon his apprehension, law enforcement agents found themselves unable to charge him with anything but tax evasion – however, the conviction of tax evasion was responsible for Al Capone’s incarceration. Although considered to have undertaken a wide range of criminal activity, Al Capone is primarily recognized for both his participation and masterminding of the smuggling of alcohol during the time of prohibition in the United States:

Al Capone Biography: Facts About Al Capone

The following are facts reflecting Al Capone Biography:

Al Capone was born on January 17th, 1899 in Brooklyn, New York; he died on January 25th, 1947 while in his home in Miami, Florida subsequent to his release from prison in 1939 – he was 48 years old

Al Capone is considered to have fronted and organized one of the foremost and illegal smuggling operations of smuggling; between 1920 and 1932, a legislative ban on alcoholic beverages  was put in place by a the Federal Government of the United States; Capone’s racketeering was considered to be a reactionary response to prohibition, which facilitated the availability of alcohol

Al Capone was also considered to be a ‘Bootlegger’, which is an individual participating in the illegal activity of smuggling that is conducted through secretive and clandestine means

The criminal activity – both structural and commercial in nature – involved the illegal provision, sale, and exchange of a wide variety of illegal and unlawful undertakings, ranging from the smuggling of alcohol to the organization of prostitution rings

Al Capone Biography: The Conviction of Al Capone

Subsequent to the finding of a ‘guilty’ verdict with regard to his charges of tax evasion, Al Capone was sentenced to an 11-year prison sentenced to be served in the United States Penitentiary in Atlanta, Georgia; in addition to this sentencing, the presiding judge mandated that the liens and repossession notices were to be placed upon the estate of Al Capone – however, the following events took place with regard to the conviction and sentencing of Al Capone:

Upon the repeal of prohibition as expressed within the 21st Amendment of the United States Constitution, Al Capone was forbidden from communicating with any individuals perceived to be former criminal associates with regard to his smuggling endeavors

On August 11th, 1934, Al Capone was transferred to Alcatraz State Penitentiary within which he was incarcerated until January 6th, 1939

On January 6th, 1939, Al Capone was moved to the Federal Prison in Terminal Island, California within which he served a year’s time; he received an early parole on November 16th, 1939 – upon parole, he resided in Palm Island, Florida until the time of his death

Al Capone Biography: Al Capone’s Final Days

Although certain Al Capone Biography suggests that a bulk of Al Capone’s estate was repossessed by the United States government, many assumed that a vast fortune remained in his possession, which was hid from law enforcement agents; however, this claim was neither substantiated nor proven

Subsequent to his parole, Al Capone continued to reside in Florida; reports of the final years of his life maintain that he was deemed unfit to continue his command with regard to the criminal organization for which he was once responsible

Close family and friends reported that prior to his stroke, he had undergone a traumatic degree of mental degradation; reports outlining the details of Al Capone’s final years illustrate that he displayed symptoms of insanity, which included ranting, raving, and paranoia

The Facts on the Oklahoma City Bombing

The Facts on the Oklahoma City BombingWhat is a Terrorist?

A terrorist refers to an individual or organization that inflicts terror in a systematic and deliberate way on a society as a means of coercion.  Technically there is no universally criminal law definition of terrorism; however, common characteristics of the act refer to the delivery of violent acts intended to precipitate fear on a given society.

Acts of terror are typically perpetrated for a political, ideological or religious goal; a terrorist will deliberately target and subsequently disregard the safety of civilians to carry-out some form of initiative. All terrorists and their underlying terrorist organizations will not align themselves with government organizations or formal government bodies.

Definitions of terrorism will always include acts of unlawful violence and war. That being said, any action that precipitates violence on a society and disrupts the harmony and general function of a particular community or sociological setting will be considered an act of terrorism. There are two forms of terrorists: international terrorists and domestic terrorists. Although both forms of terrorists will inflict carnage on a society that is primarily based off a skewed or ultra-aggressive ideology, the domestic terrorist carries-out his or her violent actions on their home country, while an International terrorist will deliver their violent actions abroad.

Oklahoma City Bombing:

The Oklahoma City bombing was a domestic terrorist attack on the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City. The Oklahoma City bombing took place on April 19, 1996 and was coordinated and delivered by Timothy McVeigh. The Oklahoma City bombing was the most violent and destructive act of terrorism on American soil until the attacks of September 11th, 2001.

The Oklahoma City bombing took the lives of 168 people (mostly employees of the United States Federal government) including 19 children under the age of 6. Additionally, more than 680 people were injured in the Oklahoma City Bombing; the severe blast damaged nearly 325 buildings within a sixteen-block radius of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building.

The Oklahoma City Bombing was sparked by Timothy McVeigh, an American militia movement compatriot. The building exploded when an explosive-filled truck–parked in front of the building—was detonated. 

The Suspects of the Oklahoma City Bombing

Within 90 minutes of the Oklahoma City Bombing, Timothy McVeigh was stopped by a state trooper for driving without a license plate; Mcveigh was subsequently charged with unlawfully carrying a weapon. Subsequent forensic evidence quickly linked McVeigh and Terry Nichols to the Oklahoma City Bombing; Terry Nichols, McVeigh’s chief accomplice was arrested in the following days and both were charged with the terrorist act.

Timothy McVeigh organized and instituted the Oklahoma City bombing as a result of his hatred for the United States federal government. McVeigh was chiefly motivated by his perceived mishandling of the Waco Siege and the Ruby incident—the Oklahoma City Bombing coincided with the second anniversary of the deaths at Waco.

Investigation of the Oklahoma City Bombing:

The official investigation of the Oklahoma City Bombing was the largest criminal investigation in American history. Both Nichols and Timothy McVeigh were tried and subsequently convicted in 1997. McVeigh was executed via the lethal injection on June 11, 2001 and Nichols, for his role as McVeigh’s accomplice, was sentenced to life in prison. Lori and Michael Fortier, accomplices who knew of the impending attacks, testified against McVeigh and Nichols. For their role in the Oklahoma City Bombing and failing to warn authorities of the impending attack, Michael was sentenced to twelve years in prison and Lori eventually received immunity for her testimony.

Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States

Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States

 

The Background of Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States:

Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision, which stated that the United States Congress could use the Constitution’s Commerce Clause to fight acts of discrimination.

Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States represented a distinct challenge to the Civil Rights Act of 1964; for the majority of the century prior to the Civil Rights Movement, race relations in the United States had been dominated by a system of segregation known as “separate but equal.” This social structure ultimately perpetuated racial tensions for African Americans were predominantly offered inferior accommodations. If you need legal advice and assistance, contact Atlanta lawyers.

Atlanta Motel v. United States Trial:

When passed on July 2, 1963, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, banned all forms of racial discrimination that was present in public places. This ban, which was placed on particularly public accommodations, was primarily based on Congress’ control of interstate commerce.

The Heart of Atlanta motel was a large hotel in Atlanta, Georgia, which refused to rent rooms to African Americans. The owner of the hotel filed a suit in federal court, arguing that the requirements of the Civil Rights Act violated his Fifth Amendment right to choose customers and operate his business as he wanted resulted in unjust deprivation of his property without due process of law and just compensation.

In response to this claim, the United States countered that Congress, under the United States Constitution’s Commerce Clause, was certainly within its power to address such provisions. In addition, the decision of Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States stated that the Fifth Amendment does not forbid regulations of interstate commerce and incidental damage did not constitute the “taking” of property without due process of law or just compensation.

Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States ruled that Congress acted within its jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce clause in passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, thereby upholding the act’s Title II in question.

The Case Profile of Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States

The following is a case profile of the legal trial eponymously titled ‘Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States’:

Date of the Trial: Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States was first argued on October 5, 1964

Legal Classification: Administrative Law; this legal field associated with events and circumstances in which the Federal Government of the United States engages its citizens, including the administration of government programs, the creation of agencies, and the establishment of a legal, regulatory federal standard

United States Reports Case Number: 379 U.S. 214

Date of the Delivery of the Verdict: Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States was decided on December 14, 1964

Legal Venue of Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States: The Supreme Court of the United States

Judicial Officer Responsible for Ruling: Chief Justice Earl Warren

Verdict Delivered: Congress did not exceed its powers under the Commerce Clause by enacting Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964—which prohibited racial discrimination in public settings, particularly areas of public accommodations.

Nelson Mandela: From Activist to President

Nelson Mandela: From Activist to PresidentWho is Nelson Mandela?

Nelson Mandela, born on July 18, 1918, served as President of South Africa from 1994 to 1999. Nelson Mandela, when elected, became the first South African president to be elected in a fully representative democratic environment. Before elected, Nelson Mandela was a staunch anti-apartheid activist and the leader of the armed wing of the African National Congress.

Nelson Mandela’s Arrest and Prison Sentence:

In 1962, Nelson Mandela was arrested and subsequently convicted of sabotage and various other charges. Nelson Mandela, as a result of these charges, was sentenced to life in prison. After serving 27 years in prison, Nelson Mandela was released on February 11 of 1990. Following his release, Nelson Mandela led his newly-formed political party in negotiations that ultimately led to the creation of a multi-racial democracy in South Africa. Nelson Mandela was a political activist who fought for the equal rights of the black majority. Often oppressed, the black community in South Africa was stripped of basic privileges, such as participating in elections, that were commonly enjoyed by their fellow white citizens.

In 1961, Nelson Mandela became leader of the armed wing branch of government. Through this organization, Nelson Mandela, coordinated sabotage campaigns against various military and government targets. These campaigns were initiated by Nelson Mandela as a plan to militarize and possible establish a military action to end the apartheid. The military actions proposed by Nelson Mandela never intended to inflict violence on citizens or people, but instead, on symbolic places, such as post offices and government offices, of apartheid. This armed movement was a last resort for Nelson Mandela that was prompted by years of repression and violence from the government; Nelson Mandela, after engaging in years of non-violent protest against apartheid realized that only military actions or symbolic destruction could achieve progress.

On August 5, 1962 Nelson Mandela was arrested after fleeing the authorities for seventeen months. When Nelson Mandela was finally caught, he was imprisoned in the Johannesburg Fort. The arrest was sparked due to the United States’ Central intelligence Agency; the CIA tipped of the security agency as the Mandela’s disguise and whereabouts. Three days after receiving the CIA’s tips, Nelson Mandela was found and subsequently charged with leading a revolt and formulating worker strikes, in addition to leaving the country illegal. On October 5, 1962, Nelson Mandela was sentenced to five years in prison.

While in prison, Nelson Mandela’s reputation grew to the point where he eventually became known as the most significant black leader and voice in South Africa.

Nelson Mandela’s Life after Prison:

Mandela was released from Victor Verster Prison in Paarl, South Africa on 11 February 1990. Mandela’s release was broadcast throughout the world and quickly was regarded as a landmark movement to end apartheid and unite the black and white community of South Africa.

On the day of his release, Nelson mandela made a speech to the entire nation; Mandela declared his commitment to peace and reconciliation with South Africa’s white minority, but it made it clear, that the armed organization’s plot and overall development was a defensive necessity to end apartheid. As a result of this statement, Nelson Mandela let the people of his nation know that the armed organization would continue to develop so long as the climate remained shaky. In this speech, Nelson Mandela also stated that his main focus was to bring peace to the black majority and give them the right to vote in both national and local elections.

John Hinckley Jr’s Failed Attempt to Assassinate President Regan

John Hinckley Jr's Failed Attempt to Assassinate President Regan Who is John Hinckley Jr.?

John Hinckley Jr. was born on May 29, 1955 and is best known for his assassination attempt on U.S. President Ronald Reagan. John Hinckley Jr. was born in Ardmore, Oklahoma to an upper-middle class family.

Hinckley’s attempt was a culminating effort to impress his favorite actress, Jodie Foster. Based off this psychotic and violent infatuation, Hinckley attempted to gain notoriety by killing the President of the United States. This egregious and malicious attack that was widely based off a child-like infatuation with a celebrity prompted the court system of the United States to find Hinckley guilty by reason of insanity. For his assassination attempt and under the insanity ruling, Hinckley was placed under institutional psychiatric care for the remainder of his life. The insanity verdict ultimately sparked a public outcry that gave way to the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984.

John Hinckley Jr. before the assassination attempt:

In 1975, Hinckley moved to Los Angeles to pursuit a career as a songwriter. Hinckley’s attempts proved unsuccessful as he toiled in poverty for the majority of his adult life. During his struggles, Hinckley would write to his parents with tales of great misfortune as a plea for money. In these letters, Hinckley also spoke of a girlfriend, who ultimately turned out to be a fabrication. Hinckley eventually moved back home where he developed a peculiar pattern of living on his own for a prolonged period of time only to return back to his parent’s house.

During this period, John Hinckley Jr. developed an unhealthy infatuation with actress Jodie Foster. Hinckley watched, on a continuous loop, the movie Taxi Driver, which featured Jodie Foster along with Robert De Niro. Deniro’s character, Travis Bickle, was a disturbed individual plotted to assassinate a presidential candidate; this plotline, ultimately motivated John Hinckley Jr., to carry out a real-life assassination attempt of his own. After months of stalking and attempting to contact Foster, John Hinckley Jr. eventually settled on a scheme to assassinate the president in the hopes of impressing the actress.

John Hinckley Jr’s. Assassination Attempt:

During the late 1970’s, John Hinckley Jr. followed then President Jimmy Carter from state to state. After being arrested in Nashville, Tennessee on a firearms charge, Hinckley went home again, where his mental conditions worsened. Hinckley began to target newly-elected President Ronal Reagan in 1981.

On March 30, 1981 John Hinckley Jr. fired a .22 revolver six times at Reagan as he left a Hilton Hotel in Washington D.C. Although John Hinckley Jr., did not directly hit Reagan–the attempt wounded press secretary James Brady, Secret Service agent Timothy McCarthy and police officer Thomas Delahanty—a ricocheted bullet hit the President in the chest, leaving Reagan with serious injuries.

After the shots were fired, John Hinckley Jr., did not attempt to flee; Hinckley was immediately rested at the scene.

John Hinckley Jr. Trial:

Hinckley was put on trial in 1982 and was charged with 13 offenses. Hinckley was ultimately found not guilty due to insanity. Hinckley was later confined at St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Washington, D.C.

Attorneys, Get Listed

X