Jason Omar Moreno v. the State of Texas
Date Filed2022-12-21
Docket13-21-00409-CR
Cited0 times
StatusPublished
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
NUMBER 13-21-000409-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
JASON OMAR MORENO, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 92nd District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina
Order Per Curiam
Appellate counsel filed an Anders1 brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel in
1See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).
this cause. Appellant has been unable to examine the record in order to file a pro se
response to the Anders brief. Appellant has filed a motion for access to the appellate
record.
The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant’s motion for access to
the appellate record, is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant’s motion
should be granted with order. Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion, and it is
hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully
examine the appellate record on or before fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. It
is FURTHER ORDERED the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the
appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313
(Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Furthermore, Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate
record is first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall
have twenty (20) days thereafter to file its response, if any.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the
21st day of December, 2022.
2