State v. Lanier

The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. LANIER, Appellant

180 Ohio App. 3d 376, 2008 Ohio 6906, 905 N.E.2d 687 • 2008-12-31

Citation180 Ohio App. 3d 376, 2008 Ohio 6906, 905 N.E.2d 687

Date Filed2008-12-31

DocketNo. C-080162.

JudgeSundermann, Painter

Cited5 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott M. Heenan, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Roger W. Kirk, for appellant.

Procedural Posture

Appeal from the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, No. B-0705661.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

Painter, J.,

concurring.

{¶ 34} I concur in Judge Dinkelacker’s analysis, given the weird state of the law. But I continue to believe that the Ohio Supreme Court needs to abrogate State v. Ranee36 in its entirety.

. State v. Ranee (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 632, 710 N.E.2d 699.