State v. Parsons
Syllabus
Motion For Leave For A New Trial; Crim.R. 33; Unavoidably Prevented: Brady v. Maryland. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by partially denying the defendant-appellant's motion for leave to file a motion for a new trial because the defendant-appellant did not carry his burden of demonstrating a Brady violation. Therefore, the defendant-appellant was not unavoidably prevented from discovering the new evidence.
Opinion Excerpt
[Cite as State v. Parsons, 2025-Ohio-4626.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HENRY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 7-25-01 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. OPINION AND CULLEN PARSONS, JUDGMENT ENTRY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal fr