Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

                                  COURT OF APPEALS
                               EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                    EL PASO, TEXAS


 VERONICA CHAVEZ,                                §               No. 08-23-00334-CV

                               Appellant,        §                  Appeal from the

 v.                                              §            388th Judicial District Court

 MARK VARA,                                      §             of El Paso County, Texas

                               Appellee.         §               (TC#2012DCM10912)



                                MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Appellant was declared a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order that prohibits her

from filing any new pro se litigation relating to the property division in her Original Decree of

Divorce without first obtaining permission from the local administrative judge. OFFICE OF COURT

ADMINISTRATION, List of Vexatious Litigants Subject to a Prefiling Order, Veronica Vara,

https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1456705/veronica-vera.pdf (last visited December 21, 2023);

TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 11.101, 11.102(a). This includes “a litigation, original

proceeding, appeal, or other claim.” Id. § 11.103(a). Despite the prefiling order covering the

subject matter of the present case, Appellant presented this appeal without an accompanying order

permitting the filing. Because Appellant has not complied with the filing requirements of Texas
Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 11 governing vexatious litigants, we dismiss the appeal.

See id. §§ 11.01–.104.

       Once a court enters a vexatious litigant order, as the one issued against Appellant, our clerk

is forbidden to file an appeal subject to the order unless Appellant obtains an order from the local

administrative judge authorizing the filing. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.103(a).

“If the clerk mistakenly files litigation presented, pro se, by a vexatious litigant subject to a

prefiling order . . . without an order from the appropriate local administrative judge” . . . Chapter

11 requires the court to stay the proceeding and “dismiss the litigation unless the [vexatious

litigant], not later than the 10th day after the date the notice is filed, obtains an order from the

appropriate local administrative judge described by Section 11.102(a) permitting the filing of the

litigation.” TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.1035(b).

       By order dated December 4, 2023, this Court stayed the proceeding and gave Appellant

notice that the appeal would be dismissed if she did not obtain, within ten days of the date of the

stay order, permission from the local administrative judge to proceed with her pro se appeal. See

TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 11.102(a), 11.1035(b).

       Because the December 14, 2023 deadline has passed, we lift the stay in this case. And

because Appellant has not demonstrated that she obtained permission from the administrative

judge to pursue this appeal, we dismiss the same. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE

ANN. § 11.1035(b).

                                      LISA J SOTO, Justice

December 21, 2023

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.




                                                 2