In Re: Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. the State of Texas
Date Filed2023-12-18
Docket05-23-00984-CV
Cited0 times
StatusPublished
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
DENIED and Opinion Filed December 18, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-23-00984-CV
IN RE GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Relator
Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-19065
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Breedlove
Opinion by Justice Molberg
In its October 5, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator challenges a trial
court’s order denying its motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy.
In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude
that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
/Ken Molberg/
230984f.p05 KEN MOLBERG
JUSTICE
–2–