the City of Austin v. Emily Poole, Lynne Shelton, and Mohit Taneja, Individually and as Representatives of All Other Parties Similarly Situated
Date Filed2014-12-31
Docket03-14-00638-CV
Cited0 times
StatusPublished
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00638-CV
The City of Austin, Appellant
v.
Emily Poole, Lynne Shelton, and Mohit Taneja, Individually and as Representatives of
All Other Parties Similarly Situated, Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-GN-09-002348, HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Counsel for appellant, The City of Austin, has filed an “Agreed Motion to Stay The
Appeal” while the City considers a modification to its ordinances that could moot the appellate
issues. Appellant’s counsel states that she has conferred with counsel for appellees Emily Poole,
Lynne Shelton, and Mohit Taneja, Individually and as Representatives of All Other Parties Similarly
Situated, who agree with this motion.
We grant the motion and abate this appeal until October 22, 2015. See Tex. R. App.
P. 42.1(a)(2)(C). If the modification to the ordinances resolves the appellate issues by that date,
the parties are instructed to file a motion to reinstate and dismiss the appeal. If the modification to
the ordinances does not resolve the appellate issues by that date, the parties are instructed to file
a report informing this Court about the status of the appeal and requesting any necessary extension
of the abatement.
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin
Abated
Filed: December 31, 2014
2