Ray Fox v. Somerset Apartments
Date Filed2010-12-23
Docket02-10-00328-CV
Cited0 times
StatusPublished
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-10-00328-CV
RAY FOX APPELLANT
V.
SOMERSET APARTMENTS APPELLEE
------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT
------------
On November 12, 2010, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk
responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that
arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk=s record as required by
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2).
We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless
1
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record
and provided this court with proof of payment.
Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk=s
record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want
of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
37.3(b), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: December 23, 2010
2