Estate of Mary Laverne Boortz
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH Ā |
Ā
Ā
NO. 02-11-00475-CV
Ā
Ā
|
Estate of Mary Laverne Boortz, Deceased |
Ā |
Ā |
|
Ā |
||
|
Ā |
Ā |
Ā |
----------
Ā
FROM THE County Court at Law OF Hood COUNTY
----------
Ā
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
----------
Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Appellant Mary Denise Langwell attempts to appeal the trial courtās July 25, 2011 order removing her as independent executrix of the Estate of Mary Laverne Boortz. Ā Appellant timely filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, extending the deadline for filing the notice of appeal until October 24, 2011. Ā See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(4); Tex. R. Civ. P. 306c.Ā But appellant did not file a notice of appeal until November 14, 2011, and there is no evidence that she mailed her notice of appeal during the time for filing a motion to extend. Ā See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b), 26.3.
On November 17, 2011, we sent appellant a letter expressing our concern that we lack jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was untimely filed. Ā See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 26.1; Crites v. Collins, 284 S.W.3d 839, 840 (Tex. 2009) (indicating that the timely filing of a notice of appeal under rule 26.1 is jurisdictional). Ā We informed appellant that unless she or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, this appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.Ā Appellant filed a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal.
Because appellantās notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Ā See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
Ā
Ā
PER CURIAM
Ā
PANEL:Ā LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
Ā
DELIVERED:Ā December 22, 2011
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.