Ernest Henry Walker v. the State of Texas
Date Filed2023-12-21
Docket14-23-00796-CR
Cited0 times
StatusPublished
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 21, 2023
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00796-CR
ERNEST HENRY WALKER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3
Ellis County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2210493
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal of the trial court’s order dismissing the case
against appellant. In Texas, appeals in criminal cases are permitted only when they
are authorized by statute. State ex rel. Lykos, 330 S.W.3d 904, 915(Tex. Crim. App. 2011); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02. Generally, a criminal defendant may only appeal from a final judgment. See State v. Sellers,790 S.W.2d 316
, 321 n. 4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). A “final judgment” is a “final judgment of conviction,” which is defined in the Code of Criminal Procedure as “the written declaration of the court signed by the trial judge and entered of record showing the conviction or acquittal of the defendant.” Raley v. State,441 S.W.3d 647, 650
(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, pet ref’d.); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art.
42.01 § 1. Appellant was not convicted or acquitted. The State filed a motion to
dismiss the case which the trial court granted.
On November 15, 2023, this court notified appellant that we lacked
jurisdiction over the appeal and that it was subject to dismissal without further
notice unless appellant demonstrated, within 21 days, that the court has
jurisdiction. Appellant did not file a response.
Because this appeal does not fall within the exceptions to the general rule
that appeal may be taken only from a final judgment of conviction, we have no
jurisdiction.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Hassan, Poissant, and Wilson.
Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
2