In Re Long
In Re Carl LONG
Attorneys
Carl Long, Ft. Stockton, pro se., John H. Jackson, Corsicana, for appel-lee.
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
ORDER
On October 6, 2006, the Clerk of this Court received several documents from Relator Carl Long in the above-referenced original proceedings.
In No. 10-06-239-CV, the Clerk received and filed Long’s “Motion to Show Relator Complies with Order Issued and Exhibit as Proof.” The Court will treat this document as a supplemental record. Tex.R.App. P. 52.7(b).
In No. 10-06-235-CV, the Clerk received, but inadvertently did not file, Long’s “Motion to Submit Exhibits to Support Application for Mandamus and Order Issued by This Court.”
The Clerk marked as “received” the cover letter accompanying Long’s Affidavit of Indigence and his inmate trust fund account print-out. The Clerk is ordered to file these documents in both No. 10-06-235-CV and No. 10-06-239-CV.
With regard to the above documents, we suspend the rule for proof of service (Tex.R.App. P. 9.5) under these circumstances. See Tex.R.App. P. 2; see also Jones v. State, No. 10-06-00289-CR, slip op. at 3, 2006 WL 3438574 (Tex.App.-Waco Nov.22, 2006, no pet. h.) (Gray, C.J.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication) (suspending proof of service requirement in appeal involving incarcerated, pro se appellant). The Clerk shall mail copies of the above documents to Respondent on the
. The dissent mischaracterizes a confidential, internal note that discusses not circulating internally Long's documents that are at issue in this order (his supplemental appendices) until the Respondent has filed responses to the petitions.