Dr. Shakeel Uddin v. Loretta Worsham
Date Filed2014-12-23
Docket01-14-00949-CV
Cited0 times
StatusPublished
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
Opinion issued December 23, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
ββββββββββββ
NO. 01-14-00949-CV
βββββββββββ
DR. SHAKEEL UDDIN, Appellant
V.
LORETTA WORSHAM, Appellee
On Appeal from the 333rd Judicial District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2011-13002
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Dr. Shakeel Uddin, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal
because he no longer wishes to pursue it and requests that all costs be assessed
against the party incurring the same. Although there is no certificate of
conference, this motion has been on file with the Court for more than 10 days and
no party has responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2).
No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).
Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal, with costs to be
taxed against the party who incurred the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (d),
43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown.
2