🔍 Search Court Cases
⚙️ Refine Search
State v. Jackson
⭐ 101 citedThe trial court's finding appellant guilty of one count of first-degree felony rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(c) and one count of third-degree felony sexual battery in violation of R.C. 2907....
VELAZQUEZ-HERRERA
⭐ 88 citedVELAZQUEZ-HERRERA, 24 I&N Dec. 503 (BIA 2008) ID 3610 (PDF) (1) For purposes of the ground of removal set forth at section 237(a)(2)(E)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)...
Matter of Knoke
⭐ 69 citedThe district court's probable cause determination in a civil commitment case becomes moot once the commitment hearing is held. In proceedings for the civil commitment of a sexually dangerous individua...
State v. Buie
⭐ 30 cited<bold>1. Evidence — victim's good character — harmless error</bold> <block_quote> The trial court committed harmless error in a first-degree sexual assault, robbery with a dangerous weapon, secon...
State v. Smith
⭐ 24 cited<bold>1. Confessions and Incriminating Statements — extrajudicial</bold><bold>confession — corpus delicti rule — first-degree sexual</bold><bold>offense</bold> ...
State v. Hammett
⭐ 20 cited<bold>1. Evidence — expert testimony — sexual</bold> <bold>abuse — victim's history combined with physical</bold> <bold>findings</bold> <block_quote> The trial court did not err by admitting a me...
State v. Douglas C.
⭐ 19 citedA criminal information is duplicitous when it charges a defendant in a single count with two or more distinct and separate criminal offenses, thereby implicating the defendant's constitutional right t...
State v. Svoboda
⭐ 15 citedCONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – COUNSEL – DUE PROCESS – COMPULSORY PROCESS – EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE – CONFRONTATION CLAUSE – R.C. 2945.481 – EXPERT WITNESS – HEARSAY – EVID.R. 404(B) – MISTRIAL – INDICTME...
State v. Smith
⭐ 13 citedThe trial court did not err in finding appellant guilty after a bench trial of three counts of sexual battery and three counts of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, or in sentencing appellant conse...
In re D.R.
⭐ 10 citedCriminal law—Juvenile law—R.C. 2152.84(A)(2)(b)—Due process of law—Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution—Article I, Section 16, Ohio Constitution—Fundamental fairness—R.C. 2152.84(A)(...
State v. Haynes
⭐ 8 citedCRIMINAL LAW - unlawful sexual conduct with a minor attempted sexual battery individual and aggregate felony sentences consideration and application of R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 consecutive sentences s...
State v. Stevens
⭐ 8 citedOsowik. 1) inadvertent failure to preserve potentially useful evidence contained in T.S.'s cell phone not a due process violation 2) no unfairly prejudicial prosecutorial misconduct in closing 3) jury...
State v. Campbell
⭐ 7 citedCRIMINAL - sentencing consecutive prison terms proportionality finding seriousness of offender's conduct danger offender poses to the public conduct of the offender prior convictions repeat offenses g...
State v. Stennett
⭐ 6 citedSexual battery sentence review R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 R.C. 2953.08 sex offender registration requirements plea colloquy Crim.R. 11. Affirmed. There is no reversible error in this appeal because the...
State v. Todd
⭐ 4 citedJudgments affirmed. The trial court did not err when ruling that the state was not entitled to a nunc pro tunc entry stating appellee's classification as a sexual predator under Megan's Law, former R....
State v. Bouyer
⭐ 4 citedSixth Amendment bills of particulars mistrial erroneous evidence plain error verdict forms victim-impact testimony record to refresh recollection veracity testimony sufficiency of the evidence sexuall...
State v. Wuensch
⭐ 3 citedCrim.R. 52(B)/plain error ineffective assistance of counsel R.C. 2907.02(D)/rape shield/prior claim of sexual assault manifest weight. Under a plain error review, the prosecutor's opening statement an...
State v. Snider
⭐ 2 citedCRIMINAL - Attempted Rape Gross Sexual Imposition Sexual Battery Unlawful Sexual Conduct with a Minor expert report failure to disclose exclusion of testimony Crim.R. 16(K) trial strategy ineffective ...
State v. Wymer
⭐ 2 citedCRIMINAL LAW - rape gross sexual imposition victim is less than thirteen years of age force or threat of force amending indictment superseding indictment continuance reasonable opportunity to prepare ...
State v. Ulm
⭐ 2 citedAppellant pleaded guilty to two counts of rape (under age 10/force), two counts of rape (under age 10), and two counts of gross sexual imposition (under age 13). Consistent with the parties' agreement...
State v. Franco
⭐ 2 citedSufficiency of the evidence gross sexual imposition R.C. 2907.05(A)(1) force force beyond the act itself Crim.R. 7(D) indictment modified R.C. 2945.79(D) sexual imposition R.C. 2907.06 endangering chi...
State v. Smith
⭐ 1 citedSufficient manifest weight credibility gross sexual imposition age impairment force purpose sexual gratification animus harm allied offense merger. The defendant's convictions are supported by suffici...
State v. Vanpernis
⭐ 1 citedgross sexual imposition R.C. 2907.05 insufficient evidence...
State of Tennessee v. Quinton Devon Perry
⭐ 0 citedIn this appeal, we address principles governing the imposition of consecutive sentencing for "an offender whose record of criminal activity is extensive." Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-115(b)(2) (2019). Qui...
State of Tennessee v. Guillermo Zapata
⭐ 0 citedThe Defendant, Guillermo Zapata, was convicted in the Shelby County Criminal Court of two counts of aggravated sexual battery, a Class B felony. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court merged the ...