π Search Court Cases
βοΈ Refine Search
Childs v. HANCOCK COUNTY BD. OF SUP'RS
β 15 citedState Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Cosme V.
β 15 citedLos Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. J.M.
β 15 citedEdvon v. Morales
β 15 citedCiv.R. 56 police officers immunity malicious prosecution probable cause aggravated menacing child endangering. Plaintiff's claim for malicious prosecution failed as a matter of law because probable ca...
Quamme v. Quamme
β 15 citedFor purposes of determining child support, commissions do not necessarily constitute self-employment income under N.D. Admin. Code Β§ 75-02-04.1-01(10). Debt regularly forgiven by an employer from a lo...
State v. Svoboda
β 15 citedCONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL β COUNSEL β DUE PROCESS β COMPULSORY PROCESS β EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE β CONFRONTATION CLAUSE β R.C. 2945.481 β EXPERT WITNESS β HEARSAY β EVID.R. 404(B) β MISTRIAL β INDICTME...
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.
β 15 citedSan Bernardino County Children & Family Services Department v. R.B.
β 15 citedState Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Johnny S.
β 15 citedSanta Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. A.V.
β 15 citedLessard v. Johnson
β 14 citedA district court has discretion in deciding whether to grant a new trial under N.D.R.Civ.P. 59. When a party moves for a new trial under N.D.R.Civ.P. 59, the party is limited on appeal to review of th...
In Re Termination of the Parent-Child Relation.
β 14 citedState Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Alfonso M.-E.
β 14 citedBurress v. Burress
β 14 cited<bold>Domestic Violence β protective order β insufficient evidence</bold> <block_quote> The trial court erred by issuing a Domestic Violence Protective Order (DVPO) where there was no competent e...
State v. Fannon
β 14 citedendangering children permitting child abuse R.C. 2903.15 R.C. 2919.22 joinder severance Crim.R. 14 failure to appear prosecutorial misconduct plain error Crim.R. 52(B) Bruton Rule confrontation clause...
Childress v. MUZZLE
β 13 citedLos Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Superior Court
β 13 citedRothschild v. Edwards
β 13 citedIn re Attallah N. Administration for Children's Services
β 13 citedRowan B. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services
β 13 citedin the Interest of J.D.S., a Child
β 13 citedHebrew Institute for Deaf & Exceptional Children v. Kahana
β 13 citedSt. Elizabeth's Child Care Center v. Deparment of Public Welfare
β 13 citedSan Joaquin County Department of Child Support Services v. Winn
β 13 citedFrey v. Best
β 13 cited<bold>1. Divorce β alimony β reduction β findings</bold> <block_quote> The trial court erred by reducing a husband's alimony obligation to zero without making findings regarding the wife's reason...