Siltstone Servs., L.L.C. v. Guernsey Cty. Community Dev. Corp.
Citation171 Ohio St. 3d 762, 220 N.E.3d 762, 2022 Ohio 4659
Date Filed2022-12-27
Docket2020-1093
Cited0 times
StatusPublished
Syllabus
Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on the authority of Siltstone Resources, L.L.C. v. Ohio Pub. Works Comm. and Ohio Pub. Works Comm. v. Barnesville.
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as
Siltstone Servs., L.L.C. v. Guernsey Cty. Community Dev. Corp., Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-
4659.]
NOTICE
This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an
advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to
promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65
South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other
formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before
the opinion is published.
SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-4659
SILTSTONE SERVICES, L.L.C., APPELLEE, v. GUERNSEY COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLANTS; ET AL.,
APPELLEES.
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it
may be cited as Siltstone Servs., L.L.C. v. Guernsey Cty. Community Dev.
Corp., Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4659.]
Court of appealsā judgment affirmed on the authority of Siltstone Resources, L.L.C.
v. Ohio Pub. Works Comm. and Ohio Pub. Works Comm. v. Barnesville.
(No. 2020-1093āSubmitted December 23, 2022āDecided December 27, 2022.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Guernsey County,
No. 19CA000047, 2020-Ohio-3877.
_________________
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
Siltstone Resources, L.L.C. v. Ohio Pub. Works Comm., ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2022-
Ohio-483, ___ N.E.3d ___, and Ohio Pub. Works Comm. v. Barnesville, ___ Ohio
St.3d ___, 2022-Ohio-4603, ___ N.E.3d ___. Appellant Guernsey County
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Community Development Corporationās proposition of law No. III is dismissed as
having been improvidently accepted.
OāCONNOR, C.J., and FISCHER, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ.,
concur.
KENNEDY, J., dissents and for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion
in Barnesville, would reverse the court of appealsā judgment and would reinstate
the trial courtās judgment.
DEWINE, J., dissents and would reverse the court of appealsā judgment and
would reinstate the trial courtās judgment.
_________________
Dave Yost, Attorney General, Benjamin M. Flowers, Solicitor General,
Samuel C. Peterson, Deputy Solicitor General, and Rachel Huston and Caroline
Mills, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee Ohio Public Works Commission.
Kohrman, Jackson & Krantz, L.L.P., and Maribeth Meluch; and Hanlon,
McCormick, Schramm, Bickford & Schramm Co., L.P.A., Erik A. Schramm, and
Kyle W. Bickford, for appellant Guernsey County Community Development
Corporation.
Pelini, Campbell & Williams, L.L.C., Craig G. Pelini, and Paul B. Ricard,
for appellants Synergy Land Company, L.L.C., and Whispering Pines Land
Company, L.L.C.
Bricker & Eckler, L.L.P., Matthew W. Warnock, Christine Rideout Schirra,
Kara H. Herrnstein, and Aaron M. Bruggeman, for appellant Gulfport Energy
Corporation.
_________________
2