Welsh v. New York State Comptroller
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitionerās application for accidental disability retirement benefits.
Petitioner, a police officer with the Suffolk County Police Department, sustained injuries when an emotionally disturbed man that he was escorting suddenly lunged at him. Petitionerās subsequent application for accidental disability retirement benefits was denied and he requested a hearing and redetermination.
The determination should be confirmed and the petition dismissed. For purposes of accidental disability retirement benefits, the underlying accident must be āa sudden, fortuitous, out of the ordinary and unexpected event that does not result from an activity undertaken in the performance of regular or routine employment dutiesā (Matter of Dzwielewski v McCall, 277 AD2d 622, 622 [2000]). The Comptroller has exclusive authority to determine whether an accident occurred within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 363, and his determination must be sustained if it is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Zuckerberg v New York State Comptroller, 46 AD3d 1057, 1058 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 712 [2008]).
The record reflects that petitioner and his partner escorted a reportedly suicidal man from the manās home to the psychiatric ward of a hospital. Petitioner had previously participated in similar escort duties, and his partner testified that sometimes the subjects in such escort cases were calm, and sometimes they were not. This man did not act in an aggressive manner and did not resist when the officers handcuffed his arms behind his back before transporting him to the hospital. At the hospital, the man remained under the officersā control in a small police waiting room when, still in handcuffs, he suddenly ran across the small room and lunged at petitioner, causing petitioner to fall and sustain injuries. Petitionerās partner and hospital security guards quickly pulled the man off of petitioner. The entire incident lasted a minute or less. No charges were brought against the emotionally disturbed man.
Rose, J.P., Stein and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Petitionerās application for performance of duty disability retirement benefits was granted.