Peter G. v. Karleen K.
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
The court properly dismissed the petition where the evidence failed to establish by a fair preponderance thereof that respondent committed acts that would constitute assault in the third degree during an incident where the partiesā five-year-old son would not willingly attend a weekend visit with petitioner (see Family Ct Act § 812 [1]; § 832; Penal Law § 120.00). There exists no basis upon which to disturb the courtās credibility determinations (see Matter of Smith v Smith, 308 AD2d 592 [2003]).
We decline to review petitionerās request that the Family Court Judge be recused and that his custody petition be assigned to a different judge, since this issue is raised for the first time on appeal. ConcurāLippman, P.J., Andrias, Nardelli, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.