Heltz v. Barratt

Mary T. Heltz v. Bruce S. Barratt

24 N.Y.3d 1185, 27 N.E.3d 471, 3 N.Y.S.3d 757 • 2014-12-17

Citation24 N.Y.3d 1185, 27 N.E.3d 471, 3 N.Y.S.3d 757

Date Filed2014-12-17

JudgeAbdus, Lippman, Pigott, Read, Rivera, Salaam, Smith

Cited28 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Personius Melber LLP, Buffalo (Scott R. Hapeman of counsel), for appellant., Barth Sullivan Behr, Buffalo (Andrew J. Kowalewski of counsel), for respondents.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order af*1187firmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to produce admissible evidence raising a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendant Barratt had an opportunity to avoid the collision.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.