People v. Ingram

The People of the State of New York v. Robert L. Ingram

24 N.Y.3d 1105, 26 N.E.3d 242, 2 N.Y.S.3d 414 • 2014-12-16

Citation24 N.Y.3d 1105, 26 N.E.3d 242, 2 N.Y.S.3d 414

Date Filed2014-12-16

JudgeAbdus, Lippman, Pigott, Read, Rivera, Salaam, Smith

Cited1 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (David A. Heraty of counsel), for appellant., Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Sherry A. Chase of counsel), for respondent.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The determination whether police have reasonable suspicion to justify a stop involves a mixed question of law and fact (People v Woods, 98 NY2d 627, 628 [2002]). Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.