People v. Walker

The People of the State of New York v. Frederick E. Walker

18 N.Y.3d 839, 962 N.E.2d 261 • 2011-12-20

Citation18 N.Y.3d 839, 962 N.E.2d 261

Date Filed2011-12-20

Cited6 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, James S. Hinman, P.C., Rochester (James S. Hinman of counsel), for appellant., Michael C. Green, District Attorney, Rochester (Stephen X. O’Brien of counsel), for respondent.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order *840modified and case remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings, and as so modified, affirmed. We conclude that on this record defendant satisfied his burden of showing that a reconstruction hearing is necessary to determine whether he was present during the Sandoval hearing. Upon remittal, if it is determined that defendant was not present during the Sandoval hearing, a new trial must be ordered; if it is determined that defendant was present, the judgment of conviction should be amended to reflect that result.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Cipajrick, Gbaffeo, Read, Smith and Jones. Taking no part: Judge Pigott.