Souza v. Nago
CourtHawaii Supreme Court
Date FiledSeptember 10, 2026
DocketSCEC-26-0000598
JudgeMcKenna
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX
10-SEP-2026
03:17 PM
Dkt. 72 ODMR
SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
________________________________________________________________
KRISTEN K. SOUZA, also known as KANANI SOUZA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SCOTT T. NAGO, in his official capacity as Chief Elections
Officer, Office of Elections, State of Hawaiʻi; STATE OF HAWAIʻI
OFFICE OF ELECTIONS; CHADD KADOTA, in his official capacity as
Acting City Clerk, City and County of Honolulu;
REX QUIDILLA, in his official capacity as the Elections
Administrator, City and County of Honolulu; and SHEILA MEDEIROS,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
(By: Ginoza, J., and Intermediate Court of Appeals
Associate Judge McCullen, in place of Devens, C.J., recused,
and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Guidry,
assigned by reason of vacancy; with
McKenna, Acting C.J. and Eddins, J., dissenting)
Upon consideration of Defendant Sheila Medeiros’s
Motion for Reconsideration, filed September 9, 2026, which seeks
reconsideration of this court’s September 4, 2026 Findings of
Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment, Defendant Medeiros has
not established points of law or fact that this court has
overlooked or misapprehended. See Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate
Procedure Rule 40(b) (eff. 2000).
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is
denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, September 10, 2026.
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen
/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry
DISSENT BY McKENNA, ACTING C.J. AND EDDINS, J.
We would grant Sheila Medeiros’s Motion for
Reconsideration in part. For the reasons set out in our amended
separate opinion to be filed tomorrow, we would vacate Judgment
paragraph A of the September 4, 2026 Findings of Fact,
Conclusions of Law, and Judgment, and complete the primary after
the November 3, 2026 general election, with the winner deemed
elected under Article III, Section 4. We would deny the motion
in all other respects.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
2