In re Petition of Reapportionment Commission
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
Date FiledFebruary 10, 2012
DocketSC18907
JudgeRogers; Norcott; Palmer; Zarella; McLachlan; Eveleigh and
Harper
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
******************************************************
The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the
beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will
be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the
date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative
date for the beginning of all time periods for filing
postopinion motions and petitions for certification is
the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion.
In no event will any such motions be accepted before
the ‘‘officially released’’ date.
All opinions are subject to modification and technical
correction prior to official publication in the Connecti-
cut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the
event of discrepancies between the electronic version
of an opinion and the print version appearing in the
Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Con-
necticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the
latest print version is to be considered authoritative.
The syllabus and procedural history accompanying
the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official
Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service
and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes
of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of
the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be repro-
duced and distributed without the express written per-
mission of the Commission on Official Legal
Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut.
******************************************************
IN RE PETITION OF REAPPORTIONMENT
COMMISSION, EX REL.
(SC 18907)
Rogers, C. J., and Norcott, Palmer, Zarella, McLachlan, Eveleigh and
Harper, Js.
Argued February 6—officially released February 10, 2012*
Ross Garber, with whom, on the brief, was Charles
L. Howard, for the Republican Members of the Connect-
icut Reapportionment Commission.
Aaron S. Bayer, with whom were Bradley W. Moore
and Thomas Clauss, Jr., for the Democratic Members
of the Connecticut Reapportionment Commission.
David N. Rosen, with whom were Jeremy Golubcow-
Teglasi and, on the brief, William M. Bloss, for the
Coalition for Minority Representation Statewide.
Andrew J. McDonald, for the Governor of the state
of Connecticut, Dannel P. Malloy.
George Jepsen, attorney general, Gregory T. D’Auria,
solicitor general, and Maura Murphy Osborne, assistant
attorney general, filed a brief for the state of Con-
necticut.
Opinion
PER CURIAM. Pursuant to the authority conferred
by Article third, § 6 (d), of the Constitution of Connecti-
cut, as amended by Articles XII, XVI and XXVI of the
Amendments, the Court hereby adopts as the estab-
lished plan of congressional districting the plan
depicted and described in Exhibits 1 and 4 of the Draft
Report and Plan of the Special Master, Nathaniel Per-
sily, dated January 13, 2012, designated by the Special
Master to be his final report and plan on January 19,
2012. The plan complies in every respect with our Janu-
ary 3, 2012 Order Directing Special Master.
Appended hereto is the Draft Report and Plan of
the Special Master and its supporting Appendix.1 The
foregoing materials, along with the census block equiva-
lency file(s) that provide the details of the plan, will be
filed today with the Secretary of the State for publica-
tion. Upon publication, the plan of congressional dis-
tricting shall have the full force of law.
The Special Master has submitted to the Court an
itemization of the fees incurred in producing the report
and plan. Those fees total $36,400, an amount which
we find to be reasonable. Pursuant to this Court’s
December 27, 2011 order, the fees of the Special Master
are to be assessed against the Reapportionment Com-
mission. The Commission shall remit full payment
directly to Special Master Persily.
* February 10, 2012, the date that this order was issued, is the operative
date for all substantive and procedural purposes.
1
The Draft Report and Plan of the Special Master and its supporting
Appendix are contained in the file of this case in the Supreme Court clerk’s
office and are provided on the Secretary of the State’s Web site, available
at http://cga.ct.gov/red2011/.