Gregory Hartmann v. Brian Chudzik
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date FiledSeptember 24, 2026
Docket25-2762
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 25-2762
GREGORY HARTMANN; JOHN HAYS; DEWAYNE BAILEY; BRYANT ISHAQ;
HOWARD CHAPMAN; CHRISTO BELONY; ROBERT EDWARDS, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated,
Appellants
v.
HON. BRIAN E. CHUDZIK; HON. EDWIN TOBIN; HON. MILES BIXLER; HON.
ANDREW LEFEVER, in their official capacities as Magisterial District Judges;
LANCASTER COUNTY; WARDEN OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON
(D.C. No. 5:22-cv-01588)
SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
Present: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, HARDIMAN, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO,
BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY, PHIPPS, FREEMAN, MONTGOMERY-REEVES,
CHUNG, BOVE, and RENDELL*, Circuit Judges
The petition for panel rehearing filed by Appellants in the above-entitled case
having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is
hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is GRANTED. The Clerk
*
Judge Rendell’s vote is limited to panel rehearing only.
is directed to file the amended opinion contemporaneously with this order. As the
revisions do not affect the disposition of the appeal, the judgment will remain as filed.
The petition for rehearing en banc filed by Appellees in the above-entitled case
having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to
all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge
who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the judges of
the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the Appellees’ petition for
rehearing en banc is DENIED.
BY THE COURT,
s/Patty Shwartz
Circuit Judge
Dated: September 24, 2026
ARR/cc: All Counsel of Record