CN Holding, LLC and Interested Parties Claiming an Interest Through CN Holding, LLC v. Yesenia Lynett Cantu and Ricardo Cantu

NUMBER 13-26-00539-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG CN HOLDING, LLC AND INTERESTED PARTIES CLAIMING AN INTEREST THROUGH CN HOLDING, LLC, Appellants, v. YESENIA LYNETT CANTU AND RICARDO CANTU, Appellees. ON APPEAL FROM THE 139TH DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Silva, Peña, and West Memorandum Opinion by Justice West The trial court entered a temporary injunction order (TI) that does not set a trial date. On appeal, appellants assert the TI is void. We agree.  Rule 683 provides that a TI “shall include” a trial setting. TEX. R. CIV. P. 683. When a TI lacks a trial setting, appellate courts must declare void and dissolve the TI and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Qwest Comm. Corp. v. AT&T Corp., 24 S.W.3d 334, 337–38 (Tex. 2000); Conway v. Shelby, 432 S.W.3d 377, 380–81 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2014, no pet.). Accordingly, without reaching the merits, we declare void and dissolve the TI and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings. All pending motions are denied. JON WEST Justice Delivered and filed on the 15th day of October, 2026. 2