Full Opinion

Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas 10-25-00450-CR Alan Zavala, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee On appeal from the 12th District Court of Madison County, Texas Judge David W. Moorman, presiding Trial Court Cause No. 24-14450 CHIEF JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court. MEMORANDUM OPINION The trial court found Alan Zavala violated six terms and conditions of his community supervision for the felony offense of tampering or fabricating physical evidence with an intent to impair. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 37.09. As a result, the trial court revoked his community supervision and assessed his punishment at five years confinement. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.34. This appeal ensued. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Zavala’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief in support of the motion asserting that she has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in her opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Counsel’s brief evidences a professional evaluation of the record for error and compliance with the other duties of appointed counsel. We conclude that counsel has performed the duties required of appointed counsel. See id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812–13 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978); see also Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 407–09 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, “after a full examination of all the proceedings, . . . decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.” Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 349–50, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509– 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is “wholly frivolous” or “without merit” when it “lacks any basis in law or fact.” McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 438 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988). After a review of the entire record in this appeal, we have determined the appeal to be wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. Alan Zavala v. The State of Texas Page 2 Counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of Zavala is granted. MATT JOHNSON Chief Justice OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: July 16, 2026 Before Chief Justice Johnson, Justice Smith, and Justice Harris Affirmed Motion granted Do Not Publish CR25 Alan Zavala v. The State of Texas Page 3