Full Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00209-CV Alex E. Jones and Free Speech Systems, LLC, Appellants v. Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis, Appellees NO. 03-25-00617-CV NO. 03-25-00906-CV Free Speech Systems, LLC, Appellant v. Neil Heslin, Scarlett Lewis, David Wheeler, Francine Wheeler, Jacqueline Barden, Mark Barden, Nicole Hockley, Ian Hockley, Jennifer Hensel, Donna Soto, Carlee Soto Parisi, Carlos M. Soto, Jillian Soto-Marino, William Aldenberg, William Sherlach, Robert Parker, and Erica Ash, Appellees FROM THE 261ST & 459TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-18-001835, THE HONORABLE MAYA GUERRA GAMBLE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PER CURIAM The memorandum opinion and order dated April 29, 2026, addressing the above-listed appeals arising from the same trial-court cause is supplemented and amended as follows: This Court abates the appeal in Cause No. 03-23-00209-CV and remands that cause to the trial court to take evidence and make findings regarding the supersedeas bond contest. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4(d). The evidence and findings shall include events occurring since the trial court’s October 6, 2025 Order on Plaintiffs’ Objection to Net Worth Declaration and Motion for Sanctions. The trial court shall direct that its order be filed with this Court in a supplemental clerk’s record by May 29, 2026. This Court’s August 28, 2025 Order staying the turnover order in Cause No. 03-25-00617-CV remains in effect. This Court temporarily stays the turnover order in Cause No. 03-25-00906-CV pending further order on the Appellant’s Emergency Motion for Immediate Stay of Void Turnover Order Issued in Violation of the Bankruptcy Automatic Stay. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4(c) (“The appellate court may issue any temporary orders necessary to preserve the parties’ rights.”). The Appellants in these cases are prohibited from dissipating or transferring assets to avoid satisfaction of the judgment. This requirement can be enforced by the trial court, though the trial court cannot make any order that interferes with the appellants’ use, transfer, conveyance, or dissipation of assets in the normal course of business. See id.; cf R. 24.2(d). It is ORDERED May 21, 2026. Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Ellis No. 03-23-00209-CV – Abated and Remanded No. 03-25-00617-CV – Ordered No. 03-25-00906-CV – Ordered Filed: May 21, 2026 2