Cameron County, Texas, Eddie Trevino, Jr., Sofia C. Benavidez, Joey Lopez, David A. Garza, and Gus Ruiz v. Chief Deputy Robert Gracia
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Date FiledJuly 30, 2026
Docket13-24-00451-CV
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
NUMBER 13-24-00451-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS,
EDDIE TREVINO, JR., SOFIA C.
BENAVIDEZ, JOEY LOPEZ, DAVID
A. GARZA, AND GUS RUIZ, Appellants,
v.
CHIEF DEPUTY ROBERT GARCIA, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 404TH DISTRICT COURT
OF CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Peña, West, and Cron
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña
This cause is before this Court on the parties’ joint motion to dismiss this appeal.
On May 11, 2026, this Court abated this appeal upon the parties’ notice of settlement
which requested abatement while a settlement agreement was finalized. In the joint
motion to dismiss, the parties advise this Court they have reached an agreement and
request that we set aside the trial’s court judgment without regard to the merits and
remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the
agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2), governing the voluntary dismissal
of civil appeals by agreement, allows an appellate court to:
(A) render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement;
(B) set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and
remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in
accordance with the agreement; or
(C) abate the appeal and permit the proceeding in the trial court to
effectuate the agreement.
Id. R. 42.1(a)(2). Accordingly, we reinstate this case, grant the parties joint motion,
vacate the September 9, 2024 order denying appellants’ plea to the jurisdiction without
regard to the merits, dismiss the appeal, and remand the case to the trial court for
rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement and for any further
proceedings deemed necessary. See id. Costs are taxed against appellants. Id. R.
42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”).
Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained.
L. ARON PEÑA JR.
Justice
Delivered and filed on the
30th day of July, 2026.
2