Emerald Squares Apartments v. Preston Lamkin
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Date FiledAugust 5, 2026
Docket04-26-00172-CV
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-26-00172-CV
EMERALD SQUARES APARTMENTS,
Appellant
v.
Preston LAMKIN,
Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2026-CV-01003
Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice
Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 5, 2026
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
A filing fee of $205.00 was due when appellant filed his notice of appeal. See TEXAS
SUPREME COURT ORDER REGARDING FEES CHARGED IN THE SUPREME COURT, IN CIVIL CASES IN
THE COURTS OF APPEALS, AND BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, AND
IN THE BUSINESS COURT, Misc. Docket No. 24-9047 (Tex. July 26, 2024). On March 4, 2026, the
clerk of the court notified appellant of this deficiency by letter and requested payment of the fee
no later than March 16, 2026. On June 10, 2026, we ordered appellant to pay the filing fee on or
04-26-00172-CV
before June 25, 2026. Our order cautioned appellant that this appeal would be dismissed if the
filing fee was not paid by the date provided. The filing fee remains unpaid, and appellant has not
filed a sworn statement of inability to pay court costs.
Additionally, on June 4, 2026, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating
the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record
and that appellant is not entitled to preparation of the clerk’s record without paying the fee. On
June 10, 2026, we ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court by June 25, 2026,
showing that either: (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the
clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. We warned
appellant this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if appellant failed to respond to
our order. To date, appellant has not responded to either of our orders.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b)
(permitting appellate courts to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when an appellant fails
to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record); see also TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.3(c) (permitting appellate courts to dismiss an appeal when appellant fails to comply with a
court order).
PER CURIAM