Forty Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-Five Dollars and 25/100 in US Currency v. the State of Texas
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Date FiledAugust 27, 2026
Docket09-26-00050-CV
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-26-00050-CV
__________________
FORTY THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED NINETY-FIVE DOLLARS AND
25/100 IN US CURRENCY, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 60th District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 24DCCV1063
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On February 4, 2026, Appellant Rickey Thomas filed a notice of appeal from
a final judgment signed in Trial Court Case Number 24DCCV1063 on January 28,
2026. Upon receiving the notice of appeal from Appellant, the Clerk of the Court
issued an invoice for the filing fee for the appeal. On March 24, 2026, the Clerk
notified the parties that Appellant has not remitted the filing fee and enclosed a Bill
of Costs. By letter dated May 22, 2026, the Clerk notified the parties that Appellant
1
has not paid the filing fee as directed in our letters, invoice, and Bill of Costs
previously forwarded to Appellant. A Certified Bill of Costs for the filing fee was
enclosed and provided to Appellant. The notice warned Appellant that the appeal
would be dismissed without further notice unless Appellant paid the filing fee by
June 8, 2026. As of this date, Appellant has failed to pay the filing fee as directed by
this Court.
On February 4, 2026, the Clerk notified the parties that the record was due
March 30, 2026. On May 27, 2026, the trial court clerk notified this Court that no
payment arrangements for the record have been made. Also on May 27, 2026, the
appellate clerk notified the parties that Appellant had not established indigent status
and that the clerk’s record had not been filed due to Appellant’s failure to pay or to
arrange to pay the fee required to prepare the clerk’s record. We warned Appellant
that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless Appellant
established that he had made the arrangements required to pay the fee or that he
needed more time to do so. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). After the Clerk of this Court
sent the parties a letter warning of the consequences of the foregoing, the Court did
not receive a response.
Appellant has not paid the filing fee for the appeal, nor has Appellant
explained why he has not paid the fee for the clerk’s record; therefore, we dismiss
the appeal for want of prosecution. Id. 5, 42.3(c), 43.2(f).
2
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on August 26, 2026
Opinion Delivered August 27, 2026
Before Johnson, Wright and Chambers, JJ.
3