Mark Vasquez v. the State of Texas
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Date FiledOctober 1, 2026
Docket13-26-00604-CR
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
NUMBER 13-26-00604-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
MARK VASQUEZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 105TH DISTRICT COURT
OF KLEBERG COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices Cron and Fonseca
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Tijerina
This cause is before the Court upon its own motion. On August 27, 2026, appellant
filed a notice of appeal attempting to appeal a judgment of conviction in trial court cause
number 25-CRF-0592. We now dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Upon review of the documents before use, the trial court has certified that this is a
plea bargain case and appellant “has NO right of appeal” and that he “waived the right of
appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On August 28, 2026, we ordered appellant’s
counsel to review the record and determine whether appellant had the right to appeal.
Appellant’s counsel responded to the notice. Upon review of the record and documents
before us, we are of the opinion that appellant waived the right to appeal.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed
if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.
See id. R. 25.2(d), 37.1, and 44.3. Accordingly, this case is dismissed for want of
jurisdiction.
JAIME TIJERINA
Chief Justice
Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the
1st day of October, 2026.
2