Mark Smith v. James T. Sierra, Joy Weber, Kimberly Reedy, Sierra Cosmetic and Family Denistry, P.C. D/B/A Friendswood Dental Group
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Date FiledMay 28, 2026
Docket01-25-00737-CV
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Opinion issued May 28, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-25-00737-CV
———————————
MARK SMITH, Appellant
V.
JAMES T. SIERRA, JOY WEBER, KIMBERLY REEDY, SIERRA
COSMETIC AND FAMILY DENISTRY, P.C. D/B/A FRIENDSWOOD
DENTAL GROUP, AND MICHAEL O’DONNELL, Appellees
On Appeal from the 212th District Court
Galveston County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 25-CV-1332
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Mark Smith, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his
application for temporary injunction. Because the trial court rendered a final
judgment in the underlying case on December 22, 2025, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction.
DISCUSSION
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(a), on any party’s
motion or on its own initiative, this Court may dismiss an appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). If a case becomes moot, the court must
dismiss the case for want of jurisdiction. See Heckman v. Williamson Cty., 369
S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012).
An appellate court retains jurisdiction over the appeal of an interlocutory
order granting or refusing a temporary injunction until a final judgment moots
consideration of the appeal. See Bienati v. Cloister Holdings, LLC, 691 S.W.3d
493, 497 (Tex. 2024); see also Isuani v. Manske–Sheffield Radiology Grp., P.A.,
802 S.W.2d 235, 236 (Tex. 1991). If the trial court renders and signs a final
judgment in the case while an appeal of its temporary injunction order is pending,
the case on appeal becomes moot. Isuani, 802 S.W.3d at 236. “When a case
becomes moot on appeal, all previous orders pertaining to the temporary injunction
are set aside by the appellate court and the case is dismissed.” Id.
The trial court entered final judgment in the underlying case on December
22, 2025. The trial court’s final judgment renders this interlocutory appeal from its
September 11, 2025 order denying Appellant’s temporary injunction moot. See id.
2
We thus vacate the trial court’s order denying the temporary injunction and dismiss
this appeal as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(e); Isuani, 802 S.W.2d at 236; Taj v.
Highlander Cmty. Servs. & Inv., LLC, No. 05-19-00369-CV, 2019 WL 4033946, at
*1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 27, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.) (setting aside trial
court’s order denying request for temporary injunction and dismissing appeal
because trial court had signed final judgment and nothing indicated appeal was not
moot). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
Conclusion
We vacate the trial court’s order denying the temporary injunction and
dismiss this appeal as moot.
Veronica Rivas-Molloy
Justice
Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Guiney, and Morgan.
3