Full Opinion

Opinion issued August 27, 2026 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-26-00038-CV ——————————— ALLISON MELISSA PADILLA, Appellant V. LEO VAN JOHNSON, JR., Appellee On Appeal from the 280th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2025-40244 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Allison Melissa Padilla, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial court’s December 12, 2025 Protective Order. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). Appellant filed her opening brief on July 2, 2026. On July 30, this Court notified her that her brief did not comply with Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1.1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. We struck the brief and ordered Appellant to file a corrected brief that complied with Rule 38.1 within fifteen days of the date of our order, making her brief due on or before August 14, 2026. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a). The Court informed Appellant that if she failed to file a corrected brief by the stated deadline, her appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice. To date, Appellant has not filed a corrected brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) (where appellant failed to file brief, appellate court may dismiss appeal for want of prosecution), 42.3(b)–(c), 43.2(f). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Rivas-Molloy and Guiney. 1 We informed Appellant that her brief did not: contain a table of contents indicating the subject matter of each issue or point, or group of issues or points; contain an index of authorities arranged alphabetically and indicating the pages of the brief where the authorities are cited; state concisely the nature of the case, the course of proceedings, and the trial court’s disposition of the case, supported by record references; state concisely all issues or points presented for review; state concisely and without argument the facts pertinent to the issues or points presented, supported by record references; contain a succinct, clear, and accurate summary of the arguments; contain a clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations . . . to the record; or include an appendix with the necessary contents. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(b), (c), (d), (f), (g), (h), (i), and (k). 2