In the Interest of W.C.S. v. the State of Texas
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Date FiledNovember 5, 2026
Docket09-26-00279-CV
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-26-00279-CV
__________________
IN THE INTEREST OF W.C.S.
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 418th District Court
Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 23-01-00151
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On July 7, 2026, Alexis Leighann Jamail filed a notice of appeal from a final
judgment signed on June 30, 2026. Upon receiving the notice of appeal from
Appellant, the Clerk of the Court issued an invoice for the filing fee for the appeal.
By letter dated August 18, 2026, the Clerk notified the parties that Appellant has not
paid the filing fee as directed in our letter and invoice previously forwarded to
Appellant. A Certified Bill of Costs for the filing fee was enclosed and provided to
Appellant. The notice warned Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed without
1
further notice unless Appellant paid the filing fee by August 28, 2026. As of this
date, Appellant has failed to pay the filing fee as directed by this Court.
On September 1, 2026, the trial court clerk notified this Court that no payment
arrangements for the record have been made. Also on September 1, 2026, the
appellate clerk notified the parties that Appellant had not established indigent status
and that the clerk’s record had not been filed due to Appellant’s failure to pay or to
arrange to pay the fee required to prepare the clerk’s record. We warned Appellant
that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless Appellant
established that she had made the arrangements required to pay the fee or that she
needed more time to do so. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). After the Clerk of this Court
sent the parties a letter warning of the consequences of the foregoing, the Court did
not receive a response.
Appellant has not paid the filing fee for the appeal, nor has Appellant
explained why she has not paid the fee for the clerk’s record; therefore, we dismiss
the appeal for want of prosecution. Id. 5, 42.3(c), 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on November 4, 2026
Opinion Delivered November 5, 2026
Before Golemon, C.J., Wright and Chambers, JJ.
2