Full Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-26-00141-CV __________________ MAYRA MIRANDA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT OF KIN, MM, Appellant V. ARNULFO GONZALEZ, Appellee __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 457th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 25-08-12850 __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On March 25, 2026, “Mayra Miranda, Individually and as Next of Kin, MM,” hereinafter “Appellant,” filed a notice of appeal from a final judgment signed on February 21, 2026. Upon receiving the notice of appeal from Appellant, the Clerk of the Court issued an invoice for the filing fee for the appeal. By letter dated May 11, 2026, we notified the parties that Appellant has not paid the filing fee as directed in our letter and invoice previously forwarded to Appellant. A Certified Bill of Costs 1 for the filing fee was enclosed and provided to Appellant. We warned Appellant in our letter dated May 11, 2026, that unless the filing fee was paid, the appeal would be dismissed without further notice on any date after Tuesday, May 26, 2026. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). As of this date, Appellant has failed to pay the filing fee as directed by this Court. On May 5, 2026, the District Clerk notified the Court that Appellant had failed to pay or to make the arrangements necessary for the District Clerk to prepare the clerk’s record. We notified the parties that Appellant had not established indigent status, and that the clerk’s record had not been filed due to Appellant’s failure to pay or to arrange to pay the fee required to prepare the clerk’s record. We warned Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless Appellant established that it had made the arrangements required to pay the fee or that she needed more time to do so. See id. 37.3(b). After the Clerk of this Court sent the parties a letter warning of the consequences of a failure to take the action necessary to file the clerk’s record, the Court did not receive a response. Appellant has not paid the filing fee for the appeal, nor has Appellant explained why she has not paid the fee for the clerk’s record; therefore, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Id. 5, 42.3(c), 43.2(f). 2 APPEAL DISMISSED. PER CURIAM Submitted on June 24, 2026 Opinion Delivered June 25 2026 Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ. 3