Full Opinion

Opinion issued August 25, 2026 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-26-00802-CV ——————————— IN RE TIMOTHY AGUILAR, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Timothy Aguilar, proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asserting that the trial court has “fail[ed] to perform its ministerial duty . . . by failing and refusing for more than six months to rule on [r]elator’s properly filed Motion to Deem [Relator’s] First Request for Admissions to [Real Party in Interest, Walene Garza Alvares,] as Admitted.”1 Relator’s mandamus petition requested that this Court issue a writ of mandamus and direct that the trial court “be compelled to act and exercise [its] discretion—whichever way—by ruling, within a specified reasonable time,” on relator’s motion. On request of the Court, real party in interest filed a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on August 13, 2026, arguing that relator’s petition failed to establish he was entitled to mandamus relief. Relator filed a reply in support of his petition for writ of mandamus on August 16, 2026. We conclude that relator has failed to establish he is entitled to mandamus relief, and therefore, the Court denies relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We dismiss any pending motion as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Morgan. 1 The underlying case is In the Matter of Timothy Aguilar and Walene Garza Alvares, Cause No. 2025-81963, in the 507th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Lillian H. Alexander presiding. 2