Full Opinion

Opinion issued August 26, 2026 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€” NO. 01-26-00867-CV โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€” IN RE RAMESH KAPUR, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Ramesh Kapur, acting pro se, filed a document entitled โ€œEmergency Motion for Appellate Review and Reduction of Supersedeas Security Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24.4.โ€1 Above the title, Kapur added a handwritten note calling his filing a โ€œPetition.โ€ To the extent Kapurโ€™s filing is a Rule 24.4 motion absent a 1 The underlying case is SWE Living, LLC v. Ramesh Kapur d/b/a AIC Management, cause number 2023-80075A, pending in the 333rd District Court of Harris County, Texas. pending appeal, the motion is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4(a), To the extent Kapur requests that we consider his filing to be a petition for writ of mandamus, the petition is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). All pending motions, including Kapurโ€™s motion for temporary relief and stay, are denied as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Rivas-Molloy and Guiney. 2