In Re Dane Christian Truelson Hans v. the State of Texas
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Date FiledAugust 31, 2026
Docket01-26-00858-CV
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Opinion issued August 31, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-26-00858-CV
———————————
IN RE HANS DANE CHRISTIAN TRUELSON, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Hans Dane Christian Truelson, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for
writ of mandamus asserting that the trial court had signed an “illegal protective
order” at the request of real party in interest, Briana Camille Truelson, relator’s
wife.1 Relator’s petition contends that the trial court’s order is “in contradiction to
1
The underlying case is Brianna Camille Truelson v. Hans Dane Christian Truelson,
Cause No. 2026-40010, in the 280th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the
Honorable Damiane Dianne Curvey presiding.
the [United States] Constitution” and “corrupt[s] the blood of a person, punishing a
child for the possible future sins of a parent.” Relator’s petition requested that this
Court “overturn the protective order, falsely named, against [relator] and . . . order
[the trial court] not to issue [orders] betwixt married couples.”
We conclude that relator has failed to establish he is entitled to mandamus
relief, and therefore, the Court denies relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Morgan.
2