In Re Surafel Hailu Solomon v. the State of Texas
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Date FiledJuly 22, 2026
Docket09-26-00213-CR
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-26-00213-CR
__________________
IN RE SURAFEL HAILU SOLOMON
__________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding
Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause Nos. F22-39310-0, F22-39311-0, and F22-39312-0
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Surafel Hailu Solomon filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asking this
Court to compel the trial court to dismiss three criminal cases for lack of a speedy
trial.
On February 6, 2026, Solomon filed a motion to dismiss the indictments with
prejudice under article 28.061 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure for want of
a speedy trial. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 28.061 (describing consequences
of the dismissal of an indictment for lack of a speedy trial). Solomon did not request
1
a trial in the motion he filed with the trial court. According to Solomon, on March
16, 2026, the trial court instructed the staff to put the case on the trial docket.
Generally, “a defendant seeking to compel a dismissal of an indictment on
speedy trial grounds has an adequate remedy at law” through an appeal if he is
convicted. Smith v. Gohmert, 962 S.W.2d 590, 593 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (orig.
proceeding). On this record, Relator has not established that he is entitled to
mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. See
Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on July 21, 2026
Opinion Delivered July 22, 2026
Do Not Publish
Before Golemon, C.J., Wright and Chambers, JJ.
2