In Re Raymond E. Carr v. the State of Texas
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Date FiledJune 24, 2026
Docket03-26-00555-CV
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-26-00555-CV
In re Raymond E. Carr
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HARRIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Raymond E. Carr has filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to
direct the district court clerk for Harris County to file and docket his lawsuit.
This Court’s mandamus jurisdiction is expressly limited by statute to: (1) writs
against a trial court judge in this Court’s district, and (2) all writs necessary to enforce our
jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221. As to the former, the Third Court of Appeals has
jurisdiction of appeals from the trial courts located in Bastrop, Bell, Blanco, Burnet, Caldwell,
Coke, Comal, Concho, Fayette, Hays, Irion, Lampasas, Lee, Llano, McCulloch, Milam, Mills,
Runnels, San Saba, Schleicher, Sterling, Tom Green, Travis, and Williamson counties. See id. §
22.201(d). This is an original proceeding from Harris County. See id. § 22.221. Thus, we have
no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus outside this Court’s district. See id. As to the latter,
Relator has not demonstrated that the exercise of our writ power is necessary to enforce our
jurisdiction in this case. Therefore, Relator has not established that we have jurisdiction to issue
the writ he seeks.
For these reasons, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App.
P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________
Karin Crump, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump
Filed: June 24, 2026
2