In Re Pinchus Shapiro v. the State of Texas
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Date FiledJuly 2, 2026
Docket01-26-00644-CV
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Opinion issued July 2, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-26-00644-CV
———————————
IN RE PINCHUS SHAPIRO, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Pinchus Shapiro, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of
mandamus alleging that the trial court abused its discretion and violated a
“non-discretionary ministerial duty under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 18a” by
failing to either sign an order of recusal or sign an order referring the motion to the
regional presiding judge. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 18a(f). Relator’s petition requested
that this Court issue a writ of mandamus directing the trial court “to vacate the
unauthorized summary orders denying the Motion for Recusal[] and command the
[trial court] to comply with Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 18a by immediately
referring the motion to the Regional Presiding Judge.”
In connection with his petition for writ of mandamus, relator also filed an
“Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief and Stay.” In the motion, relator
requested that the Court stay all proceedings in the underlying trial court cause
pending this Court’s review of his petition for writ of mandamus.
We conclude that relator has failed to establish he is entitled to mandamus
relief, and therefore, the Court denies relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(a), 52.3(l)(1)(B), 52.7(a). We dismiss any pending motions,
including relator’s “Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief and Stay,” as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Morgan.
2