In Re State of Texas Ex Rel. Ken Paxton
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date FiledSeptember 11, 2026
DocketWR-97,914-01
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-97,914-01
IN RE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL. KEN PAXTON, Relator
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A PETITION FOR WRIT OF
PROHIBITION IN RELATION TO JACKSON COUNTY CASE OF EX
PARTE LEJAMES NORMAN and CAMERON COUNTY CASE OF EX
PARTE JOHN ALLEN RUBIO
TRAVIS COUNTY
Per curiam. YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
OPINION
We have before us a motion for leave to file an application for writ of
prohibition filed by the Honorable Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of
Texas. Therein, he asks this Court to order the Honorable Daniella DeSeta Lyttle,
judge of the 261st District Court of Travis County, to refrain “from enjoining,
staying, or otherwise interfering with [LeJames] Norman and [John Allen] Rubio’s
Paxton_Norman/Rubio - 2
executions in any way.”
Norman and Rubio were both convicted of capital murder and sentenced to
death in their respective counties. This Court affirmed each of the convictions and
sentences on direct appeal and issued mandate. Plus, both of the inmates have
filed Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071 initial writ of habeas corpus
applications, as well as at least one subsequent writ application, in their respective
convicting courts over the years. All of the applications were ultimately denied or
dismissed by this Court.
Norman and Rubio have now filed what purports to be a civil suit in a Travis
County District Court seeking injunctive or declaratory relief regarding the drugs
to be used in their respective executions. Initially, we stayed the proceedings
below pending resolution of this prohibition and we invited the Respondent, the
Honorable Daniella DeSeta Lyttle, judge of the 261st District Court of Travis
County (or any other judge to whom this case is assigned), to respond. No
response was received.
Leave to file the application is now granted and the Respondent, the
Honorable Daniella DeSeta Lyttle (or any other judge assigned to the case), is
ordered to refrain from issuing any order purporting to stay the September and
Paxton_Norman/Rubio - 3
November executions of Jackson County death row inmate LeJames Norman and
Cameron County death row inmate John Allen Rubio. Accord State ex rel. Holmes v.
Hon. Court of Appeals for Third Dist., 885 S.W.2d 389, 394 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994)
(“Clearly, the entry of an order which stays the execution of a death row inmate is
a criminal law matter. Art. V, § 5 specifically confers exclusive appellate
jurisdiction of all cases in which the death penalty has been assessed in the Court of
Criminal Appeals.”); id. at 395–96 (“Any order by another state court which
purports to stay a scheduled execution circumvents our decision and disobeys our
mandate. . . . We hold that respondent had no jurisdiction to enjoin the scheduled
execution.”).
Delivered: September 11, 2026
Publish