Jesus S. Cortez and Edna Esther Cortez v. Benito Navarro Uribe

NUMBER 13-24-00387-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JESUS S. CORTEZ AND EDNA ESTHER CORTEZ, Appellants, v. BENITO NAVARRO URIBE, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 93RD DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Cron Memorandum Opinion by Justice Cron Upon the parties request, we abated this appeal to permit them to continue to engage in settlement negotiations. They have since filed an “Agreed Motion to Set Aside Judgment and Remand,” signed by both parties, requesting that we dispose of the appeal in accordance with their settlement agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). The Court, in accordance with the parties’ agreement, reinstates the appeal, grants the agreed motion, sets aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits, remands the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement, and taxes appellate costs against the party incurring same. See id. R. 42.1(a)(2)(B), (d); 43.4. Having disposed of the appeal at the parties’ request, no motions for rehearing will be entertained. JENNY CRON Justice Delivered and filed on the 29th day of October, 2026. 2