Aguon v. Aguon
CourtSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands
Date FiledFebruary 13, 2007
DocketCV 06-0026-GA, 2007 MP 2
JudgeDemapan, Castro, Manglona
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
IN THE
SUPREME COURT
OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS
____________________________________
CANDIDO B. AGUON,
Plaintiff/Appellee,
FOR PUBLICATION
v.
ESTRELLA B. AGUON,
Defendant/Appellant.
____________________________________
Supreme Court Appeal No. CV 06-0026-GA, 2007 MP 2
Superior Court FCD No. 06-0014
____________________________________
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
[Com.R.App.P.42(c)]
¶1 It appears from a review of the docket in this case that the record and transcript of
proceedings from the Superior Court have not been filed with the Clerk of the Supreme
Court and is significantly overdue.
¶2 Appellee filed a Motion to Dismiss the appeal on August 25, 2006, based on the
failure to file the record and transcript in a timely fashion.
¶3 The Clerk of the Supreme Court gave notice to counsel on November 20, 2006, that
the record and transcript needed to be filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court or the case
would be referred for dismissal. Appellant responded on December 6, 2006 that he would
expeditiously cause the record to be filed or seek additional time for the record to be filed.
¶4 On December 18, 2006, the Clerk of the Supreme Court issued a second notice to
counsel to cause the record and transcript to be filed with the Supreme Court on or before
February 6, 2007, or the matter would be referred to the Court for dismissal.
¶5 As of the date of this Order, no record or transcript of proceedings from the Superior
Court has been certified and filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court regarding this matter,
nor has Appellant sought any further extension of time to file the record or transcript of
proceedings.
¶6 Under the Commonwealth Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 42 (c), the ultimate
responsibility for ensuring that the record (including transcript) is filed on time is that of the
Appellant. One of the sanctions available under that rule for failure of the Appellant to cause
the record to be filed in a timely fashion is dismissal of the appeal. If a record or transcript
cannot be completed or filed within a timely fashion, then it is the Appellant’s obligation to
bring this matter to the Supreme Court’s attention through the filing of appropriate motions
for extension of time to file the record and transcript. It should not be the burden of the
Clerk of the Supreme Court to have to remind appellate counsel of the lack of a properly and
timely filed record and transcript.
¶7 Having determined that the record and transcript of proceedings have not been
certified and filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court in a timely fashion and no request for
extension of time has been made, the Court now DISMISSES this appeal for failure to
prosecute in accordance with Com. R. App. P. Rule 42 (c). Villagomez v. Sablan, 4 N.M.I.
396 (1996).
¶8 Counsel is further advised that Com. R. App. P. 42 (c) allows for additional sanctions
to be imposed for failure to prosecute an appeal and that the Court will consider those in the
future against any counsel who fail to timely cause the record of an appeal to be timely filed.
SO ORDERED this__13th__day of February, 2007.
_/s/ Miguel S. Demapan___
MIGUEL S. DEMAPAN
Chief Justice
___/s/ Alexandro C. Castro_______ ____/s/ John A. Manglona____
ALEXANDRO C. CASTRO JOHN A. MANGLONA
Associate Justice Associate Justice