Suchernick v. Ashtabula Area City Schools
CourtOhio Court of Claims
Date FiledJuly 24, 2026
Docket2026-00549PQ
JudgeSadler
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
[Cite as Suchernick v. Ashtabula Area City Schools, 2026-Ohio-2883.]
IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO
MICHAEL SUCHERNICK Case No. 2026-00549PQ
Requester Judge Lisa L. Sadler
v. JUDGMENT ENTRY
ASHTABULA AREA CITY SCHOOLS
Respondent
{¶1} The special master has issued a recommendation to dismiss this public-
records case. She recommends dismissal because the case exceeds the scope of the
special statutory process at R.C. 2743.75 and seeks to enforce overbroad records
requests.
{¶2} R.C. 2743.75(D)(2) authorizes this court to sua sponte dismiss a complaint
on the court’s own motion. See, e.g., Jones v. Allen Cty. Common Pleas Court, 2023-
Ohio-1863, ¶ 4, adopted 2023-Ohio-2324 (Ct. of Cl.) (dismissing a complaint for failure to
state a claim). The special statutory process set by R.C. 2743.75 is explicitly intended to
provide “an expeditious and economical procedure” for resolution of public-records
disputes. R.C. 2743.75(A). The process is designed accordingly, setting an abbreviated
briefing schedule, eliminating discovery and motions practice, and establishing quick
timelines for pleading and judicial decisions. See R.C. 2743.75(C)-(F). Further, a
complaint that seeks to enforce an overbroad public-records request fails to state a claim.
Ryan v. City of Ashtabula, 2023-Ohio-621, ¶¶ 9, 13, adopted 2023-Ohio-1487 (Ct. of Cl.).
The special master found that the complaint at issue exceeded the scope of this court’s
public-records process by claiming, at a conservative estimate, over 85 public-records
requests. The special master also found that many of these public-records requests failed
to state a claim because they sought to enforce an overbroad records request.
Case No. 2026-00549PQ -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY
{¶3} Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(D)(2), “Notwithstanding any provision to the
contrary in [R.C. 2743.75], upon the recommendation of the special master, the court of
claims on its own motion may dismiss the complaint at any time.” Upon review, the court
finds that the special master’s recommendation for dismissal is well taken. Accordingly,
pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(D)(2), upon the special master’s recommendation, the court
sua sponte dismisses the complaint in this case without prejudice. Court costs are
assessed against requester. The Clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment
and its date of entry upon the journal.
LISA L. SADLER
Judge
Filed June 24, 2026
Sent to S.C. Reporter 7/27/26