State v. Dougher
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
Date FiledSeptember 8, 2026
Docket2026-L-0081 & 2026-L-0082
JudgeM. Lynch
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
[Cite as State v. Dougher, 2026-Ohio-3508.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
LAKE COUNTY
STATE OF OHIO, CASE NOS. 2026-L-0081
2026-L-0082
Plaintiff-Appellee,
- vs - Criminal Appeals from the
Court of Common Pleas
VINCENT P. DOUGHER,
Defendant-Appellant. Trial Court Nos. 2026 CR 000525
2026 CR 000526
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
Decided: September 8, 2026
Judgment: Appeals dismissed
Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecutor, Lake County Administration Building, 105
Main Street, P.O. Box 490, Painesville, OH 44077 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
Vincent P. Dougher, pro se, PID# A833-162, Mansfield Correctional Institution, P.O. Box
788, 1150 North Main Street, Mansfield, OH 44901 (Defendant-Appellant).
MATT LYNCH, P.J.
{¶1} On August 3, 2026, appellant, Vincent P. Dougher, filed pro se notices of
appeal from the Lake County Court of Common Pleas’ June 30, 2026 judgment entry.
{¶2} A party who wishes to appeal from a final order shall file a notice of appeal
within thirty days of that entry. App.R. 4(A)(1).
{¶3} Pursuant to App.R. 5(A)(1), “[a]fter the expiration of the 30-day period
provided by App.R. 4(A) for the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be
taken by a defendant with the permission of the court to which the appeal is taken in the
following classes of cases: (a) Criminal proceedings . . . .”
{¶4} App.R. 5(A)(2) further provides that “[a]ny motion for permission to appeal
must be filed with the clerk of the court of appeals and must explain the reasons for the
defendant’s failure to comply with the rules for filing an appeal as of right.”
{¶5} Timely notices of appeal from the June 30, 2026 entry were due no later
than July 30, 2026, which was not a holiday or weekend. The appeals are untimely by
four days.
{¶6} Appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R.
4(A)(1) nor sought leave to appeal pursuant to App.R. 5(A). Thus, this court is without
jurisdiction to consider the appeals. Appellant has a remedy of filing a motion for leave
to file delayed appeals under App.R. 5(A).
{¶7} Accordingly, these appeals are hereby dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely.
JOHN J. EKLUND, J.,
ROBERT J. PATTON, J.,
concur.
PAGE 2 OF 3
Case Nos. 2026-L-0081, 2026-L-0082
JUDGMENT ENTRY
For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of this court, it is ordered that
these appeals are hereby dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely.
Costs shall be taxed against appellant.
PRESIDING JUDGE MATT LYNCH
JUDGE JOHN J. EKLUND,
concurs
JUDGE ROBERT J. PATTON,
concurs
THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES A FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY
A certified copy of this opinion and judgment entry shall constitute the mandate
pursuant to Rule 27 of the Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure.
PAGE 3 OF 3
Case Nos. 2026-L-0081, 2026-L-0082