Full Opinion

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal State of Louisiana No. 26-KH-520 STATE OF LOUISIANA versus KEITH BARROW IN RE KEITH BARROW APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE STEPHEN D. ENRIGHT, JR., DIVISION "N", No. 01-6237 November 10, 2026 Panel composed of Judges Susan M. Chehardy, Scott U. Schlegel, and Timothy S. Marcel REHEARING DENIED Relator, Keith Barrow, seeks supervisory review of a writ application that he previously filed in this Court in State of Louisiana v. Barrow, 26-KH-478, on October 8, 2026. He attaches a letter to the pending writ application that explains he would like the pending writ application to be filed in place of the previous writ application due to his counsel’s “errors of misprint of several words.” As noted by relator, the current writ application is almost “word for word” similar to the writ application filed in 26-KH-478. On October 14, 2026, this Court denied the writ application filed in Case No. 26-KH-478, finding that “[r]elator’s writ application is time-barred and successive,” and also “successive and repetitive under La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.” See State of Louisiana v. Barrow, 26-KH-478 (La. App. 5 Cir. 10/14/26) (unpublished writ disposition). As such, the pending writ application filed on October 26, 2026 is essentially, verbatim, an application for rehearing of the writ application that relator previously filed and this Court previously denied. Louisiana’s Uniform Rules–Courts of Appeal, Rules 4-9 and 2-18.7, do not permit rehearing from a writ denial.1 Therefore, given the procedural deficiencies of this application and in accordance with the Uniform Rules–Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-9 and Rule 2-18.7, this request for rehearing is denied. Gretna, Louisiana, this 10th day of November, 2026. SUS SMC TSM 1 Uniform Rules–Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-9 provides: “Rule 2-18 shall apply to requests for rehearing related to writ applications.” Rule 2-18.7 states: “An application for rehearing shall be considered only in cases where the court has: (1) Granted a writ application on the merits; (2) Dismissed an appeal; or (3) Ruled on the merits of an appeal.” SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ FREDERICKA H. WICKER CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK JUDE G. GRAVOIS MARC E. JOHNSON STEPHEN J. WINDHORST LINDA M. TRAN JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR. FIRST DEPUTY CLERK SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL TIMOTHY S. MARCEL FIFTH CIRCUIT MELISSA C. LEDET JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053) DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF POST OFFICE BOX 489 GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400 (504) 376-1498 FAX www.fifthcircuit.org NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS DAY 11/10/2026 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW: 26-KH-520 E-NOTIFIED 24th Judicial District Court (Clerk) Honorable Stephen D. Enright, Jr. (DISTRICT JUDGE) Matthew R. Clauss (Respondent) MAILED Keith Barrow #126449 (Relator) Rayburn Correctional Center 27268 Highway 21 Angie, LA 70426