Mount, Jr. v. Apao
CourtHawaii Supreme Court
Date FiledAugust 24, 2026
DocketSCWC-23-0000590
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
24-AUG-2026
02:18 PM
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX Dkt. 13 OGAC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
GERALD K. MOUNT, JR. and JANE R. MOUNT,
Respondents/Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants/
Cross-claimants-Appellees,
vs.
MARGARET APAO,
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,
and
DIRK APAO, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF
ROSE MARIE ALVARO, DECEASED,
Petitioner/Defendant/Counterclaimant/Third-Party Plaintiff-
Appellant,
and
SESHA LOVELACE, AS CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF
ROSE MARIE ALVARO, DECEASED,
Respondent/Defendant/Cross-claim Defendant-Appellee,
and
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, A NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS
TRUSTEE FOR THE STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES
CORPORATION MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, 2005-SC1,
Respondent/Third-Party Defendant/Cross-claimant Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CC111002005)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ.,
and Circuit Judge Drewyer, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Pursuant to this court’s discretion set forth in
Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes § 602-59(a), Petitioners’ Application
for Writ of Certiorari filed on June 25, 2026, is hereby
accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
held in this case, subject to further order of the court. Any
party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the
Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral
argument.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit
supplemental briefing on the following question:
Has there been compliance with this court’s remand mandate
in Mount v. Apao, 139 Hawaiʻi 167, 384 P.3d 1268 (2016),
which held that based on U.S. Bank’s wrongful nonjudicial
foreclosure, on remand, if the Mounts are determined to be
innocent purchasers for value, then the circuit court must
determine an appropriate remedy, which generally would be
an award of damages? Mount, 139 Hawaiʻi at 169, 180, 384
P.3d at 1270, 1281.
Within twenty days from the date of this order, each
party shall file a supplemental brief, not exceeding twenty
pages in length, exclusive of title page(s), indices,
appendices, and certificate of service. The parties may file
2
responses to each other’s briefs within ten days thereafter. No
reply briefs shall be filed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 24, 2026.
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Michelle L. Drewyer
3