In re: Living Estate of Habig
CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Date FiledSeptember 23, 2026
DocketCAAP-25-0000840
StatusPublished
๐ฐ News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
23-SEP-2026
08:53 AM
Dkt. 266 ODSLJ
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
IN THE MATTER OF THE LIVING ESTATE OF JAMIE JEFFREY HABIG,
SETTLOR AND TRUSTEE, Petitioner-Appellant
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
(CASE NO. 5CLP-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
(By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Gluck, JJ.)
Upon review of the record, it appears that on
November 15, 2025, self-represented Petitioner-Appellant Jamie
Jeffrey Habig filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal from
"[a]ll prior denials of motions, petitions, and requests," and
"[a]ny and all orders, rulings, or inactions of the Court that
affect the rights, authority, or standing of the Temporary
Trustee in administering the Estate" by the Circuit Court of the
Fifth Circuit in 5CLP-XX-XXXXXXX. On September 16, 2026, Habig
filed in the appeal a second notice of appeal, purporting to
appeal from the "deemed denial" of his June 17, 2026 Petition for
Termination of Guardianship and Petition for Production of
Records, which the court construes as an amended notice of
appeal.
The Circuit Court has not entered a judgment in the
underlying case under Hawai#i Probate Rules Rule 34(a) or (c),
none of the orders or decisions from which Habig appeals are
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
independently appealable under the collateral order or Forgay1
doctrines, and the Circuit Court has not granted leave for
interlocutory appeal under Hawaii Revised Statutes ยง 641-1(b)
(2016). See Greer v. Baker, 137 Hawai#i 249, 253, 369 P.3d 832,
836 (2016) (setting forth the requirements for appealability
under the collateral order and Forgay doctrines)).
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are
dismissed.
Dated: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 23, 2026.
/s/ Karen T. Nakasone
Chief Judge
/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka
Associate Judge
/s/ Daniel M. Gluck
Associate Judge
1
Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. 201 (1848).
2